Chile: New provisional withholding regarding capital gains in the sale of shares and quotas of Chilean companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New provisional withholding regarding capital gains in the sale of shares and quotas of Chilean companies

winter.jpg

pelegri.jpg

Rodrigo Winter


Loreto Pelegrí

In case a non-resident holds shares or quotas of a Chilean stock corporation (SA) or limited liability company (SRL), Chilean law provides for a mechanism for the payer to make a provisional withholding on account of the capital gains tax to be paid by the transferor. In this sense, since the capital gains tax applicable to the exchange or transfer of quotas of an SRL was previously subject to the general tax regime, the law provided that the payer should withhold 20% over the sales proceeds, regardless of any gain or loss in the transaction. If, at year end, there was no gain, then the transferor could request the refund of the amounts provisionally withheld.

In the case of the capital gains tax applicable to the exchange or transfer of SA shares, and if the gain was subject to the general tax regime, the law provided that the provisional withholding was 20% over the sales proceeds. However, if the gain was subject to the sole tax regime, then a 20% provisional withholding would have to be applied over the gain, and in case a gain could not be determined, then a 5% provisional withholding would have to be applied over the sales proceeds.

On September 27, 2012 Law N° 20.630 was published in the Official Gazette, amending certain tax provisions. Among other changes, such regulation modified the capital gains regime by extending the sole tax regime (which before was only applicable to the sale of shares of SAs) to the capital gains applicable to sale of SRL quotas.

Moreover, the provisional withholding rules were also amended, establishing that withholding on gross amounts will only be applicable in case a gain cannot be determined. In all other cases, the provisional withholding will have to be applied on a net basis (only over the effective gain).

Finally, pursuant to the new provisional withholding rule, the transferor can request to make an advance payment of capital gains taxes by means of a special procedure. On the other hand, the payer cannot withhold in case the transferor proves that all taxes have already been duly paid. Moreover, there can be cases where no withholding could apply, or where it could be applied at reduced rates in case (i) the capital gain is characterised as exempt income; (ii) there is a tax loss in the transaction; or (iii) if a reduced rate is applicable because of the existence of a tax treaty.

Further regulations are still pending to make all these new provisional withholding rules fully applicable.

Rodrigo Winter (rodrigo.winter@cl.pwc.com) and Loreto Pelegrí (loreto.pelegri@cl.pwc.com)
PwC

Tel: +56 2 29400155

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Gift this article