International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Interest deductibility changes



Rolf Saastad

Ingrid Anne Kinden

On 8 November, the new Norwegian government presented the final proposal for legislation that would limit the tax deduction of interest on related party debt. The proposed rule is designed to restrict earnings stripping via intercompany debt financing in Norway. The main features of the proposed limit on the deduction of interest on related party debt are as follows:

  • Net interest expense paid to a related party will not be deductible in a year to the extent the expense exceeds 30% of earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), subject to certain adjustments;

  • The limit will be calculated separately on an entity-by-entity basis, so no consolidated group approach will be available;

  • The threshold for the limitation to apply will be set at NOK 5 million;

  • Net interest expense in excess of the limitation will be available for a 10 year carry-forward, provided the expense falls within the 30% limitation for those years;

  • External debt for which a related party provided security will be considered internal debt and, therefore, will fall within the scope of the rules;

  • Tax losses carried forward and group contributions will not be deductible if the tax base before the limitation for deducting net interest expense is negative or zero. If an interest deduction is disallowed, the taxpayer can thus have a positive tax base and tax payable even though it has tax losses carried forward; and

  • The new legislation will apply from fiscal year 2014.

The proposed legislation is expected to be approved by the parliament without further changes.

Because the measures will apply to both Norwegian and cross-border groups, they may create challenges and require certain groups to undergo reorganisation.

Rolf Saastad ( and Ingrid Anne Kinden (


Tel: +47 23 27 98 36


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.