Spain: New tax measures affecting holdings in subsidiaries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: New tax measures affecting holdings in subsidiaries

fernandez.jpg

Pedro Fernandez

The Spanish Parliament has enacted new tax measures which will have a significant impact on the way Spanish companies have traditionally structured their investments via holdings in domestic or foreign subsidiaries. For many years Spain has been one of the few OECD jurisdictions that allows companies to take a tax deduction for the impairment of their shareholdings in subsidiaries. Although historically the deduction required the impairment of the holding to be recorded in the investor's books, this requirement was eliminated in 2008 for holdings in companies qualifying as group entities, jointly controlled entities or affiliates. In these cases the deduction, in the form of a book-to-tax adjustment, was tied to the mere reduction of the amount of equity in the subsidiary, as adjusted by (1) those expenses which were not regarded as tax deductible under the Spanish CIT Law, and (2) in the case of holdings in foreign companies, the result of re-computing the reduction in equity in accordance with Spanish GAAP.

The complexity of the two adjustments, particularly in groups with operations in multiple jurisdictions and sophisticated corporate structures, has converted this deduction into one of the most contentious areas between the Tax Administration and taxpayers. In addition, the deduction has enabled Spanish businesses to significantly reduce their corporate income tax payments. Possibly with a view to curbing these two effects, the government has proposed and the parliament has approved the elimination of this deduction. Logically, in the interest of neutrality, it has also established that losses incurred by foreign permanent establishments (PEs) will not be deductible either.

The removal of this deduction is going to affect the valuation of projects where there are multiple investors, none of whom holds a stake of more than 75% in the venture. This is the minimum threshold generally required to qualify for tax group consolidation and, where it is possible, it is certainly the most straightforward way to enjoy the tax shelter that net operating losses naturally provide.

Where that threshold is not present, which is usually the case in joint ventures, the challenge is how to optimise the use of tax losses. In other jurisdictions, this is traditionally achieved through the use of tax transparent vehicles, or entities that can be disregarded for tax purposes, in which the losses flow proportionally to the investors.

We do not currently enjoy such look-through entities in Spain, other than a form of unlimited liability partnership known as a sociedad civil which, on the other hand, is not legally designed to carry on a trade (indeed, there is some controversy about whether the sociedad civil can maintain its tax look-through status when it engages in a trade) or some special forms of agreements suitable for certain limited activities for the benefit of their members or for businesses that come together to carry out a certain project, typically of a temporary nature, such as construction work.

Where the project is located outside Spain, the challenge is even bigger – almost insurmountable – where the trade would create a PE abroad since the losses attributable to the PE will not be deductible under the new regulations. This is, undoubtedly, a matter to be carefully reviewed.

Pedro Fernandez (pedro.fernandez@garrigues.com)

Garrigues Taxand

Tel: +34 91 514 52 00

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article