New Zealand: New Zealand Inland Revenue releases multinational enterprises compliance focus
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand Inland Revenue releases multinational enterprises compliance focus

neill.jpg

Greg Neill

The New Zealand Inland Revenue has recently released a document detailing its compliance priorities for multinational enterprises doing business in New Zealand. The document is intended to provide such enterprises with transparency around Inland Revenue compliance initiatives so that these can be incorporated in processes relating to tax risk management and facilitate greater ease of doing business in New Zealand. While the Inland Revenue has historically published its annual compliance programme, this is the first time that a compliance document has been issued that is specifically tailored to multinationals. The document begins by noting that most corporate groups with over NZ$80 million ($65 million) in annual turnover will be subject to a specific compliance management programme. For example, such groups are expected to provide copies of their financial statements, tax reconciliations and group structures to the Inland Revenue concurrently with their annual income tax returns.

The document then lists ten red flags or issues that frequently attract Inland Revenue attention and the questions that will typically be asked of multinational entities in relation to those issues. These include:

  • Effective tax rate: Is the group's effective tax rate substantially less than the corporate tax rate of 28%?

  • Differing accounting treatments: Are there material differences in the treatment of major items for financial reporting and tax purposes?

  • Large tax benefits: Has the group taken part in any transactions where the anticipated net return is predominantly due to projected tax benefits?

  • Cross-border mismatches: Are there any differences in tax treatment of a transaction or an entity between countries?

Not surprisingly, the document identifies international financing arrangements and transfer pricing as being key issues for the Inland Revenue.

In relation to international financing arrangements, the pricing of interest rates and guarantee fees for associated party arrangements is noted as being a key focus. The document goes on to state that close attention will be paid to hybrid instruments (such as convertible notes), hybrid entities (such as limited partnerships) and structured or "novel" financing arrangements. It is also noted that financing arrangements which give rise to an interest deduction in New Zealand but with no corresponding withholding tax imposition will be questioned.

In relation to transfer pricing, the key issue is whether a corporate group is reporting sufficient profit locally and has applied correct transfer pricing principles to related party transactions. The document promotes an approach based on transparency whereby complex issues are dealt with between the Inland Revenue and the taxpayer up front rather than through the disputes process. Multinational groups operating in New Zealand will need to ensure that they have appropriate documentation in place to support transfer prices and will need to be in a position to explain any discrepancies between the profitability of the group's New Zealand operations compared with those of the wider group. The document also notes that advance pricing agreements (APAs) between the Inland Revenue and foreign tax authorities are becoming increasingly common with a record 21 APAs being finalised in the year to July 31 2013.

The document states that controlled foreign companies, goods and services tax and executive remuneration will also form part of Inland Revenue's ongoing compliance focus.

Greg Neill (greg.neill@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 9 367 8879

Fax: +64 9 336 5010

Mobile: +64 21 0260 5417

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
The new, fully integrated office will also offer M&A, dispute resolution, IP and corporate tax services
The new guidance concerns a recent 1% excise tax on the repurchases of corporate stock for both US and certain foreign companies
Interpath has hired a managing partner from rival accounting firm BDO to lead the new operation
Survey results of over 28,000 in-house lawyers reveal that American in-house counsel place a higher value on the reputation of external advisers than their peers elsewhere
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Andrew Leigh also endorsed new legislation designed to prevent multinationals using complex corporate structures to reduce taxes
Nick Crama and Parwesh Bissumbhar, senior director and manager respectively at Alvarez & Marsal, outline practical advice for real estate managers to comply with DAC6 regulations
The finalists for the 13th annual awards revealed
Survey results of over 25,000 in-house lawyers show competitive pricing and transparency in billing practices can help firms win clients
Gift this article