Albania: Albania signs double tax treaty with UK

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Albania signs double tax treaty with UK

philippou.jpg

likaj.jpg

Eylem Philippou


Drilona Likaj

On March 26 2013, Albania and the UK signed a double tax treaty on income and capital. The treaty generally follows the OECD model convention.

The withholding tax at source for dividends is set at 5% if the beneficial owner is a company and holding at least 25% of the shares of the company paying the dividends or 15% (subject to aforementioned capital holding) of the gross amount of the dividends where those dividends are paid out of income (including gains) derived directly or indirectly from immovable property within the meaning of Article 6 on Immovable Property by an investment vehicle which distributes most of this income annually and whose income from such immovable property is exempted from tax. In all other cases dividends are taxed at 10%.

The withholding tax at interest is set at 6% and on royalties is set at 0%.

Gains derived from immovable property and from the alienation of shares, other than shares in which there is substantial and regular trading on a stock exchange, or comparable interests, deriving more than 50% of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property may be taxable in a state where the property is situated in.

The treaty also includes the articles on exchange of information, mutual agreement and assistance in collection of taxes as seen as in the OECD Model Convention.

The treaty shall come into force after the ratification procedures completed and ratification notices exchanged by each state and shall be applicable from:

In the case of UK;

  • In respect of income tax and capital gains tax, for any year of assessment beginning on or after April 6 next following the date on which the agreement enters into force; and

  • In respect of corporation tax, for any financial year beginning on or after April 1 next following the date on which this agreement enters into force.

In the case of Albania;

  • In respect of income derived or of capital owned on or after January 1 of the calendar year next following the year in which the agreement enters into force.

Eylem Philippou (eylem.philippou@eurofast.eu)
Eurofast Taxand, Cyprus

Drilona Likaj (drilona.likaj@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Tirana Office, Albania

Tel: +355 42 248 548

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article