FYR Macedonia: Kazakhstan treaty ratified by Parliament

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: Kazakhstan treaty ratified by Parliament

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

On December 4 2012, the FYR Macedonian Parliament ratified the income tax treaty signed with Kazakhstan. The ratification was published in the Official Gazette 154 on December 7 2012. The treaty, initially signed between the two countries on July 2 2012, covers the personal income tax and profit tax in FYR Macedonia and the corporate income tax and the individual income tax in Kazakhstan. As is usually the case, the treaty is mostly harmonised with the OECD model; however, certain specifics can be noted.

Building/construction sites as well as assembly or installation projects (including any related site activity of supervisory nature) lasting for more than six months will, according to the treaty, imply a permanent establishment (PE). Services, including consulting, provided via employees and related parties, in aggregate duration in excess of six months within a 12 month period are also considered PEs.

PEs are, in addition to the standard classifications, also deemed to include installations/structures for exploration of natural resources or related supervisory service, drilling rigs and natural resources exploration ships.

As far as withholding taxes are concerned, the treaty with Kazakhstan does not deviate significantly from the norm or offer any particular tax incentives at least from the FYR Macedonian perspective; dividends are taxed at the 5% or 15% rate (the preferential rate being applicable in cases with a minimum 25% capital participation). A standard 10% withholding tax rate on interest has been agreed on and the same rate is applicable to royalties.

Employment, pensions, and artists/sportsmen income articles of the treaty are fully harmonised with the OECD convention.

Regarding the elimination of double taxation, the treaty stipulates that both countries will allow deduction from taxes in the amount of tax paid on it in the other state.

Pending Kazakhstan's ratification, the treaty will enter into force as soon as the ratification is completed and will be applicable as of the beginning of the calendar year following the year of entry into force.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office, FYR Macedonia

Tel: +389 2 2400225

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article