Albania: Prerequisites for banks’ bad debt tax deduction streamlined

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Prerequisites for banks’ bad debt tax deduction streamlined

albania-flag.jpg

Juliana Xhafa of Ernst & Young outlines new changes to the conditions required for banks and other financial institutions to have bad debts qualify for tax deductibility.

In addition to existing law provisions and related administrative guidelines of the Minister of Finance, which provide for certain conditions to be cumulatively fulfilled in order for the impairment of bad debts to be considered as deductible expense for Albanian corporate income tax purposes, the Ministry of Finance of Albania recently introduced a new guideline (Instruction No. 14 dated May 23 2013) providing for more clarity about when such impairments become tax deductible especially for banks and other financial institutions.

Specifically, the guideline stipulates that banks, branches of foreign banks and other financial institutions licensed by the Central Bank of Albania to engage in lending activities may claim tax deduction on the write-off of bad debts as follows:

· 365 days after submission of a request to the bailiff’s office for the initiation of compulsory enforcement procedures if the loan is secured by movable or immovable properties; or

· 365 days after the issuance of a writ of execution by the court if the loan is not secured by movable or immovable properties.

The guideline of the Ministry of Finance provides for unified deductibility rules of recognising bad debt by these institutions, enabling them to apply consistent rules for the tax recognition of debt impairments and eliminate the risk of subsequent tax adjustments upon a tax audit.

The existing law provisions require the following conditions to be met:

· The amount must have been recognised earlier in the taxpayer’s income;

· All possible legal means must have been exhausted by the taxpayer to collect the debt (and documented with a court decision or decision of any other competent institution acknowledged by law); and

· The bad debt must be written off in the accounting books.

Juliana Xhafa (juliana.xhafa@al.ey.com) is tax services manager at Ernst & Young, principal Corporate Tax correspondent for Albania.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article