Albania: Prerequisites for banks’ bad debt tax deduction streamlined

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Prerequisites for banks’ bad debt tax deduction streamlined

albania-flag.jpg

Juliana Xhafa of Ernst & Young outlines new changes to the conditions required for banks and other financial institutions to have bad debts qualify for tax deductibility.

In addition to existing law provisions and related administrative guidelines of the Minister of Finance, which provide for certain conditions to be cumulatively fulfilled in order for the impairment of bad debts to be considered as deductible expense for Albanian corporate income tax purposes, the Ministry of Finance of Albania recently introduced a new guideline (Instruction No. 14 dated May 23 2013) providing for more clarity about when such impairments become tax deductible especially for banks and other financial institutions.

Specifically, the guideline stipulates that banks, branches of foreign banks and other financial institutions licensed by the Central Bank of Albania to engage in lending activities may claim tax deduction on the write-off of bad debts as follows:

· 365 days after submission of a request to the bailiff’s office for the initiation of compulsory enforcement procedures if the loan is secured by movable or immovable properties; or

· 365 days after the issuance of a writ of execution by the court if the loan is not secured by movable or immovable properties.

The guideline of the Ministry of Finance provides for unified deductibility rules of recognising bad debt by these institutions, enabling them to apply consistent rules for the tax recognition of debt impairments and eliminate the risk of subsequent tax adjustments upon a tax audit.

The existing law provisions require the following conditions to be met:

· The amount must have been recognised earlier in the taxpayer’s income;

· All possible legal means must have been exhausted by the taxpayer to collect the debt (and documented with a court decision or decision of any other competent institution acknowledged by law); and

· The bad debt must be written off in the accounting books.

Juliana Xhafa (juliana.xhafa@al.ey.com) is tax services manager at Ernst & Young, principal Corporate Tax correspondent for Albania.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article