International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Joaquim Barbosa

Chief justice, Supreme Federal Court of Brazil

Joaquim Barbosa

Brazilian taxpayers and investors the world over had all eyes on the Supreme Federal Court in April, as it decided a dispute over the country’s controlled foreign company (CFC) rules which had lasted more than a decade. The case was Direct Action for Declaration of Unconstitutionality no. 2588, brought by the National Confederation of Industries, and dealt with the constitutionality of Brazil’s CFC rules.

Minister Barbosa is the chief justice of the Supreme Federal Court and brought his own interpretation into the judgment.

The taxpayers were arguing that Article 74 of Brazilian Provisional Measure 2,158-34/2001 (the CFC rules), which says that profits earned by controlled and associated companies abroad should be considered available for the Brazilian controller or associated company at the date on the balance sheet in which they have been assessed, was unconstitutional. They argued that the rules do not properly reflect the point at which non-distributed profits of foreign subsidiaries are made available to Brazilian shareholders, and so disregard the constitutional concept of income for taxation purposes.

In an earlier consideration of the issue, which resulted in an incomplete judgment with only nine of the eleven justices issuing decisions, Barbosa held that the action was well-founded in part. According to Barbosa, when interpreted in accordance with the Federal Constitution of 1988, Article 74 may only apply to the taxation of legal entities domiciled in Brazil whose controlled or related companies are located in tax havens.

And in April when the case was finally concluded, it was Barbosa’s interpretation that was adopted by a majority of six.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Danny Alexander

View the complete list

Next »

Piet Battiau

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Developments included the end of Saudi Arabia’s tax amnesty, Poland’s VAT battle with the EU, the Indirect Tax Forum, India’s WTO complaint, and more.
Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.