International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: The Administrative Courts and their impact on the public administration functioning


Dorina Asllani Ndreka, Eurofast Global

Since May 2012, the Parliament of Albania has approved the law for the creation and functioning of the administrative courts, at all the three levels of judiciary, including the Supreme Court's Administrative College. At the moment, the administrative disputes are reviewed by the same courts that settle civil and criminal cases. With the exception of some rules and procedures, the administrative dispute is adjudicated, in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure, according to the same rules as the other civil cases.

It is expected that the administrative court will be operable until the end of 2013. The implementation and the procedure of specialised courts for the judgment of administrative cases will influence the performance of administrative bodies, and as a consequence it will improve the climate for the business activity, by increasing the possibility to appeal an administrative act or decision considered unlawful or unfair. The main improvements will focus on these points:

The considerable reduction of the terms of settlement of an administrative case by defining quite different procedures from the ordinary civil trials. The existing procedure does not have maximum time-frames, within which the court must adjudicate, but the new law has specific terms, which are quite short compared with the current ones, reaching up to 60 days in the court of first instance.

Another improvement is the increase of the number of cases classified as administrative ones, to raise the number of cases which will be settling according to the new regulations.

To ensure the trial within a short time, the law gives a more active role to the court during the process. Furthermore, even the public administration bodies are more involved during the trial, by having the burden of proof regarding the legality of the administrative act, even when they are sued as defendant.

The new law foresees another interesting innovation, which is not applicable at the moment. Some of the decisions of the court are not appealable, such as:

  • The penalty for administrative violations, amounting to less than 20 times the value of the minimum wage;

  • The administrative act that consists of monetary obligations amounting to less than 20 times the value of the minimum wage;

  • The administrative act that has refused to deliver a monetary obligation amounting to less than 20 times the value of the minimum wage; and

  • Administrative disputes stemming from social and health insurance, economic aid and disability payments, worth less than 20 times the value of the minimum wage.

The judges for some of the administrative courts are already appointed, and it is expected that these courts will be efficient before the end of the year. While waiting to see their practical effect, it is considered one of the most effective reforms that will improve considerably the conduct of the public administration bodies, making them more responsible and prudent in fulfilling their legal duties.

Dorina Asllani Ndreka (

Eurofast Global, Tirana Office

Tel: +355 42 248 548


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.