Chile: Transfer pricing tax claims under Chile’s new tax justice law

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Transfer pricing tax claims under Chile’s new tax justice law

schmidt.jpg

dominguez.jpg

Gonzalo Schmidt


Felipe Dominguez

Since the New Tax Justice in Chile (Law N° 20.322) was enacted in 2009, many challenges have been presented both to the Chilean Tax Administration and to taxpayers regarding litigation before the Tax and Customs Courts, which are independent from the tax authority. We analyse two cases that will challenge the litigation efforts of the tax administration with respect to its position in transfer pricing cases.

The first challenge is related to transfer pricing assessments. The tax administration commonly uses other taxpayers' information to determine whether a taxpayer under assessment fulfils the arm's-length principle or not in its transactions with related entities.

Secret comparables

The tax administration is obliged under law to keep this information secret, therefore, this information is known as the "secret comparable". The tax administration has access to information regarding prices, profit margins and contractual terms related to specific transactions of taxpayers with their own related parties or with independent parties.

Often, the tax administration uses these secret comparables to analyse the transfer pricing situation of a company and its related parties abroad; however, it is not allowed to reveal this information to other taxpayers.

This situation has been under close scrutiny by lawyers that defend taxpayers' interests in transfer pricing related trials in the new Tax and Customs Courts.

Assessment methods

Another source of controversy regarding transfer pricing is the methods used by the tax administration to assess taxes under the transfer pricing regulations.

The tax administration has chosen to assess taxes in some cases using methods contained in the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.

Chile entered the OECD on May 7 2010, however, the domestic Income Tax Law only recognised one method for transfer pricing assessment until September 27 2012, when Law N° 20.630 entered into force. This sole assessment method was contained in section 38 of the Income Tax Law.

In this sense, until September 2012, the Chilean Income Tax Law did not recognise some of the methodologies contained in the OECD guidelines for assessing transfer pricing issues.

For this reason, many attorneys have argued in defence of taxpayers that there is no legal or administrative basis for the tax administration to use the OECD guidelines to assess taxes when referring to transfer pricing issues before September 2012.

When facing these two different issues related to transfer pricing assessments, taxpayers have claimed there are transparency issues in the process that result in the transgression of certain principles and rights formally recognised in Chile's political constitution, such as the legal principle, whereby the acts of the public institutions must submit to the law, and the right to a fair and just trial, and the even application of the law and the right to an even defence in trial.

It will be interesting to see how the Tax and Customs Courts will analyse these common auditing practices of the Chilean tax administration, since before these new tax courts, the Chilean tax administration fulfilled two different roles, as it enforced compliance with the tax law and at the same time was in charge of resolving judicial controversies regarding claims that taxpayers filed against the State.

Therefore new jurisprudence in these matters will serve both taxpayers and the tax administration, in confirming or modifying existing transfer pricing assessment practices.

Gonzalo Schmidt (gonzalo.schmidt@cl.pwc.com) and Felipe Dominguez (felipe.dominguez@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 29400101

Website: www.pwc.com/cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article