Austria: Austria signs treaty with Chile

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: Austria signs treaty with Chile

richardson.jpg

Elinore Richardson

On December 6 2012, Austria signed its fourth treaty with a Latin American country – adding Chile to Brazil, Mexico and Venezuela as a treaty partner. The treaty is interesting for a number of reasons. First, the withholding rates in the treaty are set for dividends (15%), for interest (5% on bank loans, traded bonds and certain sales on credit and 15% otherwise) and for royalties (5% for those payable for use of industrial, commercial or scientific equipment and 15% for all others). The Austria-Chile double tax treaty protects Chile's right to levy its two tier tax and insures that the effective Chilean tax rate on dividends paid to foreign shareholders is not reduced.

Secondly, the treaty adopts the expanded definition of permanent establishment characteristic of Chile's double tax treaties including the UN model provision to cover building sites or construction and installation projects and related supervisory activities which last more than six months. In addition, the definition includes a services provision which catches such activities that continue for periods aggregating more than 183 days in any 12 month period. Chile has recently changed its domestic taxation of permanent establishments to include their worldwide income.

Finally, the treaty includes a capital gains provision on disposals of shares unusual to recent Austrian double tax treaties, but which appears in some ways to reinforce the Chilean domestic law provisions taxing capital gains of foreign taxpayers. Gains on disposal of shares are taxable in the residence state of the seller but may also be taxed by the state in which a company is resident if, either the foreign seller at any time during the 12 months preceding the sale directly or indirectly owned shares representing 20% or more of the company's capital, or more than 50% of the value of the gains is derived from immoveable property (no carve out for business immovables). Gains from the sales of other shares may be taxed in both the residence and source state, but the source state is limited to a tax of 17%. Neither of the provisions, however, applies to allow the source state to tax pension funds on their gains which are taxable only by their state of residence.

Elinore Richardson (elinore.richardson@wolftheiss.com)

Wolf Theiss

Tel: +43 1 515 10 5900

Website: www.wolftheiss.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR spoke to two US TP experts about the long-running dispute, with one arguing that the case highlights ‘weaknesses’ with the comparable uncontrolled transaction method
The new practice, which features former ‘big four’ experience, already has over 20 team members
Speakers from companies including Uber and Stripe told the inaugural AI in Tax Forum to brace for impending changes to how advisers work
Authors from Khaitan & Co dissect a ‘welcome’ ruling, which found that the mere existence of a tax benefit would not, by itself, warrant a principal purpose test
Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Gift this article