International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Laos: Stock market tax incentives

harrison.jpg

Daniel Harrison

In what is undoubtedly an effort to promote the growth of Laos' first and only capital market, the regulators have introduced key tax incentives related to investment associated with the Lao Securities Exchange (LSX). While there are only two companies listed on the stock exchange, there is an expectation that a handful of other entities will list in the near future. The two companies listed are EDL-Generation Public Company (EDL-Gen), a subsidiary of the state-owned energy company, Electricite du Laos (EDL), and Banque Pour Le Commerce Exterieur Lao Public (BCEL), the largest bank in Laos.

As touched on in a previous article (December/January 2013), from January 1 2013 – transitional measures aside – Laos instated a general profit tax rate of 24% for domestic and foreign entities alike; a reduction from 28% previously, and 35% before that.

Additionally, in an effort to fast-track listings on the recently established LSX, companies floating on the exchange will enjoy a profit tax rate reduction of five percentage points (a tax rate of 19%) for a period of four years from the date of registration on the LSX, under article 29 of the Amended Tax Law (No. 05/NA, dated December 20 2011).

Further to the profit tax rate reduction of companies listing on the exchange, under article 46 of the Amended Tax Law, dividend distributions and profit derived from share sales of companies listed on the LSX are non-taxable income. Ordinarily, dividend distributions and profit on the sale of shares are both subject to income tax at the rate of 10%, for both domestic and foreign investors – with the tax collected via withholding.

These incentives sound great on paper, but what do they mean in real financial terms for investors? Below are two very simple comparisons between an investment in a listed and non-listed company, ceteris paribus.

Comparison A

Assuming an initial investment of $1,000, with a modest return on equity (ROE) of 15%, a dividend payout ratio of 100% and modest capital growth of 10%, the financial benefits of the tax incentives can be illustrated as shown in Table 1.

Table 1


Non-listed

Listed

Investment

$

1,000

$

1,000


Net (operating) profit before tax

$

150

$

150

Profit tax rate


24%


19%

Net (operating) profit after tax

$

114

$

122


Dividend paid

$

114

$

122

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Net dividend after tax

$

103

$

122


Proceeds from sale of investment

$

1,100

$

1 ,100

Less: Initial investment

$

-1,000

$

-1,000

Profit on sale of investment

$

100

$

100

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Profit on sale of investment after tax

$

90

$

100


Total net income from investment





Dividend

$

103

$

122

Capital growth

$

90

$

100


$

193

$

222


Total after-tax return on initial invesment


19.26%


22.15%


Additional after-tax return on initial investment




2.89%

Comparison B

For the same initial investment of $1,000, if the ROE is increased to 20%, the dividend payout ratio remains at 100% and capital growth is increased to 15%, the financial benefits of the tax incentives are compounded. See Table 2.

Table 2


Non-listed

Listed

Investment

$

1,000

$

1,000


Net (operating) profit before tax

$

200

$

200

Profit tax rate


24%


19%

Net (operating) profit after tax

$

152

$

162


Dividend paid

$

152

$

162

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Net dividend after tax

$

137

$

162


Proceeds from sale of investment

$

1,150

$

1,150

Less: Initial investment

$

-1,000

$

-1,000

Profit on sale of investment

$

150

$

150

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Profit on sale of investment after tax

$

135

$

150


Total net income from investment





Dividend

$

137

$

162

Capital growth

$

135

$

150


$

272

$

312


Total after-tax return on initial invesment


27.18%


31.20%


Additional after-tax return on initial investment




4.02%

While equities trading is still a relatively new concept in Laos, these favourable tax breaks coupled with the efforts of the LSX and its registered brokers to educate potential investors, along with companies' growing demand for greater access to capital raising avenues, should ensure the rapid transformation of equities investment in Laos.

Daniel Harrison (daniel.harrison@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +85 62 145 4679

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.