All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

BEPS: OECD insists it is engaging with developing countries


More than 300 senior tax officials from more than 100 jurisdictions and international organisations met in Paris on September 26 and 27 to discuss solutions to unintended double non-taxation caused by base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).

“Participants discussed the content of the action plan on BEPS released on July 19 and ways through which developing countries can engage and provide input,” said an OECD press release.

“We need to address BEPS issues in order to maintain and strengthen the existing framework to eliminate double taxation, which is key for cross-border investments. The BEPS project is both exciting and challenging and we can work together to achieve concrete results in the next 18-24 months,” said Pascal Saint-Amans, director of the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.

Saint-Amans also commented on the importance of this work for developing countries, noting that corporate income tax revenue makes up a substantial part of their total tax revenues.

Tax justice campaigners including ActionAid have stressed the importance of including developing countries in any process designed to tackle BEPS.

When G20 leaders endorsed the BEPS action plan last month, Toby Quantrill, ActionAid tax policy adviser, said the statement “still gives little assurance that these tax reform processes will respond to the needs of the world’s poorest countries”.

And Keith O’Donnell, Taxand board member and managing partner of Atoz – Taxand Luxembourg, said recent meetings hosted by bodies such as the OECD and G20 have failed to clarify how the BEPS process will include developing countries.

“The result leaves us somewhat unclear as to which is highest up the OECD’s priority list – is the BEPS initiative more about the public’s concern over multinational tax planning, or the concerns arising from profits being diverted away from developing countries?” asks O’Donnell.

Saint-Amans told delegates at the 13th International Tax Review Global Transfer Pricing Forum in New York that the 18-24 month timeframe, which has been criticised by many as too ambitious, will be achievable because of the top-down approach to the BEPS project.

“The BEPS project is being handled by governments and organisations such as the G20, whereas the intangibles project [for example] is being run by a working group involving tax experts involved in the tax market on a daily basis,” he said.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The companies have criticised proposals for the gig economy, while the UK and EU VAT gaps have fallen in percentage terms, and ITR speaks to a European Commission adviser about its VAT reforms.
Corporations risk creating administrative obstacles if the pillar two rule is implemented too soon, sources say.
Important dates for the Women in Business Law Awards 2023
The Italian government published plans to levy capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions, while Brazil and the UK signed a new tax treaty.
Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.