Palaniappan Chidambaram

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Palaniappan Chidambaram

Minister of Finance, India

Palaniappan Chidambaram

Palaniappan Chidambaram is no stranger to the role of Indian Finance Minister - he is now in his third stint and has held the position for a combined total of seven years.

In this third stint, Chidambaram has focused on improving relations between taxpayers and the authorities and here - talking to Matthew Gilleard - praises the Indian authorities for their increasingly non-adversarial approach to tax matter. He also provides an update on the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) and reveals his most important message for taxpayers for the year ahead.

International Tax Review: What do you consider to have been your biggest achievement in taxation from the past 12 months?

Palaniappan Chidambaram: I would consider the implementation of VAT in 2004-05 as the biggest achievement in taxation. At that point, VAT was the most important tax reform that had been attempted. However, I may add that the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) is ready and if we are able to pass the Bill before the expiry of the term of Parliament then that would be an even bigger achievement. In the past 12 months, specifically, I have put in long hours in finalising the DTC.

ITR: What is your top priority from a business taxation point of view at the moment?

PC: Sections of business continue to feel that there is uncertainty in taxation and tax administration. From the government’s point of view, our priority is to assure business that our policy is the following: Clarity in tax laws, a stable tax regime, a non-adversarial tax administration, a fair mechanism for dispute resolution and an independent judiciary.

By reiterating our policy and ensuring that the tax administration faithfully implements the policy, I think it is possible to reassure business.

ITR: How far do you think the tax administration and revenue authorities have come in terms of being non-adversarial?

PC: I think they are increasingly non-adversarial. Business people have told me that the Large Taxpayer Units (LTU), the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) programme, the Dispute Resolution Mechanism (DRM) and even the transfer pricing authority are increasingly adopting a consultative and deliberative approach.

ITR: The DTC Bill came in 2010, and you said the aim was not to amend ITA 1961 but to create a new Direct Taxes Code. With many provisions contained in the DTC Bill now having been legislated or implemented, where does this leave the initial aim of the DTC?

PC: The DTC will indeed be a new code. However, the DTC will not come into force until it is passed by Parliament and brought into effect. Between now and that date, there is no reason why some of the wholesale provisions of the DTC should not be made part of the current law. Hence, we have copied some of those provisions of the DTC into the present Income Tax Act.

But, if you look at the entire DTC, you will find that there are many provisions in the DTC which are a considerable advance on the provisions of the present Income Tax Act. The aims or objectives of the DTC will not in any way be eroded by incorporating some provisions into the present Income Tax Act.

ITR: Another member of our Global Tax 50 is Parthasarathi Shome. How would you describe your relationship with Shome? You also established an agenda of weekly meetings between Shome and industry - how is this progressing and is it proving useful?

PC: I have a very good working relationship with Dr. Shome. He is a highly respected tax expert. He enjoys the confidence of taxpayers both for his erudition and his patience and kind approach to tax disputes. I requested him to hold a weekly hearing and hear the tax-related grievances of different sectors of industry and trade. The exercise was a great success. Now we are looking into his recommendations on the issues and they will be addressed either administratively or through appropriate changes in the law.

Further reading

Why India has become the boy who cried wolf

Chidambaram chooses Shome to lead India’s Tax Administration Reform Commission

Tax authority shake-up suggests India is reversing aggressive stance to attract FDI


The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

David Cameron

View the complete list

Next »

Paul Collier

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article