International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: New anti-double-dip-provisions for German tax groups


Thomas Schänzle

Christian Birker

Parliament has recently enacted a number of important changes to the German tax group (Organschaft) regime. Some of the changes are welcome, particularly those easing and clarifying the formal requirements for Organschaft recognition, but others are problematic. The main instance of this latter are the dual consolidation loss (DCL) rules which now apply not only to the Organschaft parent but, with effect for all open cases, to each and every member. The intention is to combat perceived double-dip arrangements. Under the new wording, a loss of an Organschaft parent or subsidiary is to be disregarded (without carryforward) for German tax purposes to the extent it is taken into account under a foreign tax regime applied to the controlling entity, the controlled entity or any other related or unrelated party. Despite intense debate, there is still uncertainty as to the impact of these new provisions, in particular whether they apply to a German partnership as an Organschaft parent and as to the exact meaning of "losses taken into account" under a foreign tax regime. Apart from interpretive issues raised by the rule's clumsy wording, its retroactive effect probably violates constitutional law. Its conformity with European law is also questionable.

The broad wording of the new DCL rules goes far beyond the legislative intent of thwarting tax planning schemes aimed at a double dip of losses in Germany and abroad. Ordinary German inbound and outbound structures involving a German Organschaft can also be affected, such as where the foreign shareholder deducts a German Organschaft loss under a tax credit system. In such a case, the disallowance of German Organschaft losses may result in an effective double taxation.

Existing German Organschaft structures should be carefully reviewed as timely measures may have to be taken to avoid or mitigate adverse German tax consequences under the new DCL rules.

Thomas Schänzle (

Tel: +49 69 9585 6477
Christian Birker (

Tel: +49 69 9585 6061


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.