South Africa: 2013 budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: 2013 budget

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs

The 2013 budget which was released on February 27 2013 included various interesting proposals in relation to cross border transactions. It is proposed that the taxation relating to trusts in South Africa will be amended. As part of this process it is proposed that distributions from offshore foundations will be treated as ordinary revenue in the hands of South African residents. It is stated that "this amendment targets schemes designed to shield income from global taxation".

Furthermore it is proposed that a South African incorporated holding company may be set up by a listed entity to hold African and offshore operations. This entity will not be subject to any exchange control rules. The idea is to incentivise companies to manage their African and offshore operations from South Africa.

It is also proposed that further refinements will be made to the international headquarter company rules. The international headquarter company regime was introduced in 2010 to encourage international companies to invest in Africa using South Africa as a base. International headquarter company status will now be allowed for companies with shares and debt listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The participation threshold will also be reduced to 10%.

The Exchange Control Circular No 5/2013 released in conjunction with the budget states that during 2012, intellectual property transfers were deemed to be transfers of capital for exchange control purposes. The circular points out that this was a temporary measure and a joint National Treasury, Reserve Bank and South African Revenue Service panel will review this arrangement with a view to aligning intellectual property transfers with the relevant tax treatment.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)
ENS Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Fax: +27 21 410 2555

Website: www.ens.co.za

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article