South Africa: 2013 budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: 2013 budget

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs

The 2013 budget which was released on February 27 2013 included various interesting proposals in relation to cross border transactions. It is proposed that the taxation relating to trusts in South Africa will be amended. As part of this process it is proposed that distributions from offshore foundations will be treated as ordinary revenue in the hands of South African residents. It is stated that "this amendment targets schemes designed to shield income from global taxation".

Furthermore it is proposed that a South African incorporated holding company may be set up by a listed entity to hold African and offshore operations. This entity will not be subject to any exchange control rules. The idea is to incentivise companies to manage their African and offshore operations from South Africa.

It is also proposed that further refinements will be made to the international headquarter company rules. The international headquarter company regime was introduced in 2010 to encourage international companies to invest in Africa using South Africa as a base. International headquarter company status will now be allowed for companies with shares and debt listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The participation threshold will also be reduced to 10%.

The Exchange Control Circular No 5/2013 released in conjunction with the budget states that during 2012, intellectual property transfers were deemed to be transfers of capital for exchange control purposes. The circular points out that this was a temporary measure and a joint National Treasury, Reserve Bank and South African Revenue Service panel will review this arrangement with a view to aligning intellectual property transfers with the relevant tax treatment.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)
ENS Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Fax: +27 21 410 2555

Website: www.ens.co.za

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article