All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Mexico: Clarification of the term “standardised software” for tax treaty purposes



David Cuellar

Sergio Lugo

On December 28 2012, the Mexican tax authorities published the MiscellaneousTax Regulations for fiscal year 2013, including a new rule intended to clarify the concept "standardised software" for purposes of interpreting article 12 (royalty payments) of the tax treaties signed by Mexico and also in light of Mexico's view that payments for the use of non-standardised software generally qualify as royalties. In general terms, Mexico follows the OECD Model Tax Convention to elaborate tax treaties with other jurisdictions and applies the commentaries on the OECD Model Tax Convention as a legal authority to interpret tax treaties. According to paragraph 28 of the commentaries on article 12, Mexico holds the position that payments related to software are classified as royalties when less than the full rights to the software are transferred; however, this rule should not be applicable in the following cases:

  • Payments for the use of copyrights on software for commercial exploitation if, and only if, the payment is made for the right to distribute standardised software copies and to the extent such copyrights do not include the right to customise or reproduce such software.

  • Payments for the use of copyrights for the sole use and benefit of the purchaser if, and only if, the software is completely standardised and not adapted/tailored to the purchaser.

In this context, new rule I.2.1.23 provides that standardised software includes the "commercial off the shelf (COTS)" software which is granted homogeneously and massively to any person in the market. In addition, rule I.2.1.23 provides that software which is specific or special should not qualify as standardised. For these purposes, specific or special software includes the following:

  • Software somehow adapted for the purchaser/user. When the software was standardised at the beginning but then adapted for the use of the purchaser/acquirer, such software should be considered as specific or special (and therefore not standardised) as from the moment the adaptation takes place.

  • Software designed, developed or produced for one user or a group of users, for the author or the person who designed, developed or produced the software.

In light of the recent clarification of the term "standardised software", multinational companies should carefully analyse each transaction on a case-by-case basis, including a comprehensive analysis of the corresponding agreements and the technical characteristics of the software to determine any potential tax consequences in Mexico.

David Cuellar ( and Sergio Lugo (

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2022!
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree