International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

BRICS Cooperation Agreement


BRICS Cooperation Agreement

On the face of it, taxpayers should have been afraid, very afraid, of the meeting that took place in Delhi in January this year between the heads of the revenue departments in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (collectively termed the BRICS). The meeting saw the five committing to sharing best practices, helping with each other with capacity building and anti-avoidance measures, identifying non-compliance activities and implementing effective exchange of information.

Where will this cooperation go from here? Already, some of these jurisdictions, such as Brazil, India and China have different views to the 34 member states of the OECD on transfer pricing. Brazil, for example, sets fixed margins rather than applies a hierarchy of methods and China is pushing the ideas of location savings and location specific advantages as being important when taxpayers set their prices.

The last thing taxpayers will want is for these five jurisdictions to break away from or ignore OECD-led negotiations on international tax guidelines, and follow their own path. Or even different countries within the group to have their own refinements.

Along with other non-members, the five have been included in the discussions on base erosion and profit shifting which the OECD is running at the behest of the G20. However, it will be up to national governments if they want to implement anything that comes out of those talks. The approach of the BRICS will be followed with much interest.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

David Bradbury

View the complete list

Next »

Richard Brooks

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.
President Joe Biden’s nominee is set to be confirmed as IRS commissioner for a five-year term.
British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.
President Joe Biden wants to raise corporate tax and impose a higher stock buyback tax on US businesses, but his budget proposal faces insurmountable obstacles in Congress, writes Ralph Cunningham.
EY is still negotiating the terms of the plan to split its audit and consulting functions, but the future of tax services is reportedly a sticking point.
Country-by-country reporting is the best option for safe harbour provisions under the global anti-base erosion rules, according to tax directors at companies including Standard Chartered Bank and Pernod Ricard.