South Africa: Limitations against excessive interest tax deductions
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: Limitations against excessive interest tax deductions

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs

The National Treasury and the South African Revenue Service have introduced a discussion document on proposed limitations against excessive interest tax deductions. The discussion paper deals with four issues.

Firstly, hybrid debt instruments with substantive equity features. The proposal is that distributions on these instruments should be treated as dividends.

Secondly, connected person debt. The proposal in the discussion paper is to provide a limitation on interest deductions in respect of interest paid by one company to another entity within the same accounting group or in circumstances where the debt owed is guaranteed by an entity within the same accounting group. These rules will only apply in circumstances where the interest received by the lender is taxed at a low or zero rate.

Thirdly, transfer pricing considerations in relation to connected person debt entered into on a cross-border basis. It is proposed that a potential safe harbour is created in relation to such debt provided various criteria are met.

Fourthly, acquisition debt. This has been high on National Treasury's agenda for several years. It is proposed that where assets are acquired using the rollover relief provisions a particular formula will provide a limitation on the quantum of interest which will be deductible by the purchasing entity.

It is likely that there will be significant discussion generated from the proposals and the final legislation may not be enacted on the basis set out in the discussion paper. However the points made therein should be noted by affected taxpayers.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)

ENS – Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Fax: +27 21 410 2555

Website: www.ens.co.za

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Experts from TP tech provider Aibidia also warned ITR that companies ignoring pillar two is a ‘huge issue’ and a ‘red flag’
Hanno Berger was originally handed an eight-year sentence over an estimated $11 billion tax fraud; while in other news, France calls for minimum tax on the super-rich
Amount B is meant to increase simplicity and reduce uncertainty, but US TP specialists claim it may lead to controversy
Tax Foundation economist Alan Cole also signalled that pillar two has a 'considerable chance' of failing
The Labour Party is working hard to convince business that it will bring stability to tax policy if it wins the next UK general election. But it will be impossible to avoid creating winners and losers
Burrowes had initially been parachuted into the role last summer to navigate the fallout from the firm’s tax leaks scandal
Barbara Voskamp is bullish on hiring local talent to boost DLA Piper’s Singapore practice, and argues that ‘big four’ accountants suffer from a stifled creativity
Chris Jordan also said that nations have a duty to scrutinise the partnership structures of major firms, while, in other news, a number of tax teams expanded their benches
KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
Gift this article