France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses



Jacques Taquet

Emmanuel Raingeard

The administrative appeal court of Versailles rendered a decision on February 26 2013 regarding final losses of foreign subsidiaries of a French company. The Court held that French legislation, which does not allow a French parent to deduct tax losses of EU subsidiaries which the latter cannot carry forward because of local legislation which limit the period for the carryover of tax losses, is actually compatible with EU law. The French taxpayer had offset losses of its Italian and Polish subsidiaries. These losses could not be carried forward locally because of Italian and Polish legislation which limit the period for the carry forward of losses.

The court ruled that the restriction is justified and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objectives pursued. The Court seems to imply that the decision would have been different had the losses become "final" following a liquidation of the EU subsidiary.

This decision will probably be examined by the French Supreme Court. This will give an opportunity to clarify the Marks & Spencer (C-446/03) ruling that was recently confirmed in the A Oy case (C-123/11). It seems now clear that where the loss of tax losses results from the liquidation of an enterprise, they can be considered as final losses. On the other hand, the solution is far less clear where tax losses are lost as a result of local legislation which limits the period during which losses can be carried forward.

Jacques Taquet (

Tel :+33 1 56 578360

Emmanuel Raingeard (

Tel: +33 1 56 574014

Landwell & Associes – member of the PwC network

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As German clients attempt to comply with complex cross-border rules, local advisers argue that aggressive tax authorities are making life even harder
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
The UK tax authority reportedly lost a case due to missing a deadline; in other news, Canada has approved pillar two legislation
There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
It is extraordinary that tax advisers in the UK can offer their services without having to join a professional body. This looks like it is coming to an end, Ralph Cunningham writes
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
The ‘big four’ firm has also vowed to spend more on nurturing junior talent; in other news, Blick Rothenberg has hired a pair of tax partners
Gift this article