Brazil: Supreme Court rules on taxation of foreign profits
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Supreme Court rules on taxation of foreign profits

weiss.jpg

jeffrey.jpg

Nélio B Weiss


Philippe Jeffrey

In a session held on April 1 2013, the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) passed judgment on the Direct Action on the Grounds of Unconstitutionality (ADI) No. 2588, initially brought in 2001, which questioned the constitutionality of Article 74 of Provisional Measure No. 2158-35/2001 – a rule that determines the taxation of profits earned by foreign controlled and associated companies on an accrual basis (Brazilian general CFC rules). By a majority of six votes, the court:

  • Upheld the constitutionality of Article 74 with respect to controlled companies located in countries defined as tax havens under the law;

  • Declared Article 74 unconstitutional with respect to associated companies located in countries not considered as tax havens by the law; and

  • Declared unconstitutional the retroactive effect provision of the sole paragraph of Article 74, which provided that the profits earned until December 31 2001 by controlled or associated companies located abroad would be taxable at the parent/investor company on December 31 2002.

No decision was taken with regards to the constitutionality of Article 74 in the case of:

  • Controlled companies located in countries not defined as tax havens; and

  • Associated companies located in tax havens.

Further, in the same session, the court judged on two extraordinary appeals regarding the same matter (taxation of foreign controlled companies):

  • Extraordinary Appeal No. 611,586 (taxpayer's appeal, with general repercussion): Involving a controlled company located in a tax haven, and therefore, the application of Article 74 was maintained; and

  • Extraordinary Appeal No. 541,090 (Federal government's appeal, without general repercussion): Involved only controlled companies not located in tax havens and Article 74 prevailed. Further, the case was returned to the Lower Court to evaluate whether Article 74 conflicts with the double taxation treaties provisions, which the Lower Court had not considered, since it had already decided for the unconstitutionality of Article 74.

The information above was obtained directly based on speeches made during the Supreme Court´s sessions on the Direct Action on the Grounds of Unconstitutionality and Extraordinary Appeals, the votes of which are still pending formalisation and publication, which is the reason why changes to the final understanding on the judgment outcome cannot be ruled out. Upon publication, the ruling on the ADI shall have general and binding effectiveness (that is must be applied by all lower tribunals).

These decisions represent a landmark regarding the constitutionality of Brazilian general CFC rules, a discussion that has stretched over 12 years. Although the decision in Extraordinary Appeal 541,090 was unfavorable to taxpayers, this decision does not have general binding effectiveness, because it was not deliberated by the full Supreme Court. It may therefore be reconsidered by the court in a future case, although it cannot be disregard as a precedent regarding the Supreme Court's understanding on the matter.

Nélio B Weiss (nelio.weiss@br.pwc.com) and Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674 2271

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As German clients attempt to comply with complex cross-border rules, local advisers argue that aggressive tax authorities are making life even harder
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
The UK tax authority reportedly lost a case due to missing a deadline; in other news, Canada has approved pillar two legislation
There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
It is extraordinary that tax advisers in the UK can offer their services without having to join a professional body. This looks like it is coming to an end, Ralph Cunningham writes
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
The ‘big four’ firm has also vowed to spend more on nurturing junior talent; in other news, Blick Rothenberg has hired a pair of tax partners
Gift this article