EU: Commission adopts new proposal for an EU financial transaction tax
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Commission adopts new proposal for an EU financial transaction tax


Bob van der Made

As expected, the European Commission presented its new draft proposal for a Council Directive implementing a financial transaction tax (FTT) in 11 countries on February 14. The new proposal is largely based on the Commission's September 2011 proposal. It is similarly very wide in scope, both in terms of the types of transactions in scope and the financial instruments in scope. The proposal retains the approach of applying the tax to transactions involving a financial institution and placing the liability for the tax on all financial institutions involved in a transaction. The principal changes to the previous Directive are that:

  • The FTT zone is now limited to the participating members states (Austria, Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain).

  • For the purposes of determining where an entity is established under the regime, the new Directive adds the "issuance principle" to the definition of establishment. This means that a financial institution with no nexus with the FTT zone can now be liable to the tax when it is involved in a transaction over instruments issued by a company in the FTT zone. As with the earlier draft, trading with a counterparty in the FTT zone is also sufficient to bring a financial institution within the scope of the tax. The scope for a non-FTT zone financial institution to be taxed is therefore even wider under the new draft.

The fact that the EU FTT proposal has got to this stage – a draft Directive that 11 countries have been authorised to negotiate and introduce into law – shows the strength of political will behind FTT regimes. Wherever the EU FTT proposals end up, it is clear that FTTs will be a feature of the tax landscape for years to come.

Next steps

Firstly, the technical aspects of the new EU FTT proposal will be discussed in the normal Council Working Party on Taxation Issues Subgroup on Indirect Taxation. The first technical Council working group meeting on the FTT was held on February 21 2013. These technical meetings are chaired by the EU Presidency, with all 27 EU member states present, with the non-participating member states having to "act in good faith". These discussions will therefore be an open and transparent process.

Member states can join the core group of 11 countries at any time throughout the enhanced cooperation process under the principle: "once you're in, you stay in".

After the technical work is completed, the proposal will move up within the Council to the political level for a vote. The timing of this next stage will depend on the EU Presidency and, likely, Germany and France.

To be implemented, the draft Directive needs to be discussed by the 27 EU member states at the EU Council of Ministers, put to the European Parliament for a non-binding Opinion, and then agreed unanimously by the participating member states.

Only the participating countries which have formally joined the enhanced cooperation on the FTT have the right to participate in the final vote in an ECOFIN meeting on the final shape of the harmonised FTT.

Based on the current draft Directive, once an EU FTT is enacted those countries signed up to the FTT will not be able to retain existing, domestic FTTs. In summary, in what continues to be a highly political process, the EU FTT is likely to become a reality. Although the Commission's proposal forms a formal basis for what are complex talks between member states, the current proposal may still be considerably diluted. The key issues to be determined in the coming months are the precise shape of the EU FTT and when it will come into force. We understand however that it is increasingly uncertain whether a compromise can be reached before the German elections in September 2013. This means that the proposed timeline may shift.

Bob van der Made (


Tel: +31 88 792 3696


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Mexico is advised to eliminate its zero-rating for VAT, Hong Kong cuts stamp duty, road tax rates fall across the OECD and G20, and more
Ulf Johannemann, who has been on trial in Frankfurt since September, was the firm’s most senior tax partner until 2019
Important dates for the Women in Business Law Awards for 2024 revealed
More than 1,000 PwC staff in China and Hong Kong engaged in improper answer sharing, it is understood
Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month