Chile: New regulation on indirect sale of shares

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Chile: New regulation on indirect sale of shares

benedetto.jpg

bravo.jpg

Sandra Benedetto


Tomas Bravo

Before Law No. 19.840 entered into force on December 12 2002, the Chilean Income Tax Law (CITL) did not consider gains derived from the sales of shares or rights of a foreign company (a company incorporated abroad) as Chilean source income. The mentioned law introduced new rules to the case of indirect sales of shares. Indeed, according to such provision, gains obtained by a foreign company from the sale of shares or rights from another foreign company was considered as Chilean source income and accordingly subject to income tax when the purchaser was domiciled or resident in Chile and such acquisition allows it to participate with more than 10% in the profits or ownership of a Chilean entity.

On September 27 2012, a tax reform that modified the indirect sales rule, among other changes, was enacted. According to this new rule, the concept of Chilean source income is broadened. As set forth by this new provision, capital gains obtained on such indirect sale will be taxed in Chile, wherever the purchaser is domiciled, if the foreign company whose shares, quotas or rights are being sold has an underlying assets in Chile.

In general, for this rule to apply, at least 10% of the total shares of the foreign company should be alienated and one of the following two circumstances should be met: (a) 20% of the market value of the foreign company's shares owned by the seller corresponds to Chilean underlying assets; or, (b) the market value of the Chilean underlying assets amounts to 210,000 annual taxable units ($200 million).

This new indirect sale provision is also applicable in case the foreign company being sold is domiciled in a tax haven, unless the parties involved can demonstrate before the Chilean Internal Revenue Service that Chilean residents do not own 5% or more than the equity or profits and at least 50% of the equity or profits of the foreign entity is controlled by shareholders resident in a country that is not a tax haven.

Capital gains which arise from these transactions will be subject to a 35% sole tax which will be borne by the non-Chilean resident seller. For this purpose, the new law also set forth some provisions to define how the gain should be calculated.

How this rule will be applied, and for example, how the calculations to determine the relevant percentages should be made, or how indirect/direct participations will be computed, or the relevant cost determined, or how this regime will deal will international reorganisation processes are still some uncertain matters that should be clarified soon by the Chilean Internal Revenue. It is expected that a pronouncement regarding how this rule will be implemented is issued in the short-term.

This new indirect sales regulation regime shall be necessarily taken into account in case any international transaction that involves Chilean underlying assets is carried. Based on the abovementioned, a thorough analysis should be made from a tax perspective on a case-by-case basis because of the capital gain tax that may arise.

Sandra Benedetto (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com) and Tomas Bravo (tomas.bravo@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 940 0155

Fax: +56 2 940 0189

Website: www.pwc.com/cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article