New rules for taxation of dividends in Brazil?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New rules for taxation of dividends in Brazil?

mattos-filho.jpg

Law 11,638 was enacted in 2007 with the objective of adapting the Brazilian accounting rules (former regime) to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), representing a clear upgrade for investors who were able to analyse Brazilian corporations with the most-commonly adopted global system.

The tax implications of this adjustment caused controversy. The solution was a Transitional Tax Regime (RTT), which had the premise that the IFRS regime should be neutral, that is, the new rules are neither meant to create new taxation nor to grant benefits in respect to corporate taxes, including corporate income taxes IRPJ and CSLL, and tax on revenues, PIS and COFINS.

Generally, RTT states that Brazilian corporations should follow the former regime for tax purposes, disregarding the accounting changes that modify the recognition criteria of revenues, costs and expenses. Even though RTT was foreseen as provisional, new legislation to harmonise the tax rules with the IFRS regime has not been enacted.

Additionally, in September 2013, the Normative 1,397 was issued, indicating that the former regime will remain in effect for tax purposes, and also imposing tax rules that go beyond the limits of the legislation for the taxation of dividends.

As dividends are exempt from income tax, Brazilian corporations have distributed their results to investors taking into account their financial statements prepared under the IFRS regime.

Even though the tax rules do not require dividend distributions calculated based on the former regime, the Normative adopted the position that the exemption applies only to the extent that the dividends were derived from results assessed upon the former regime. With this approach, any excess of dividends – even if derived from profits assessed according to the IFRS regime – would be taxed as follows:

· Income tax up to 27.5% for Brazilian individuals;

· IRPJ and CSLL of 34% for Brazilian corporations; and

· Income tax of 15% for non-residents (or 25% for tax havens).

As this approach was not expected after so many years, there was an immediate reaction from several stakeholders, such as corporations, investors, advisers and industry associations, arguing that the Normative is unlawful and should not impose new taxation.

As a result, even though the Normative is still in force (potentially generating liabilities for dividends not taxed), it seems that the government will step back and will impose any taxation on dividends only after introducing a new law, which is expected before the end of this year.

By principal Tax Disputes correspondent for Brazil, Andrea Bazzo Lauletta of Mattos Filho Advogados.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article