New rules for taxation of dividends in Brazil?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New rules for taxation of dividends in Brazil?

mattos-filho.jpg

Law 11,638 was enacted in 2007 with the objective of adapting the Brazilian accounting rules (former regime) to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), representing a clear upgrade for investors who were able to analyse Brazilian corporations with the most-commonly adopted global system.

The tax implications of this adjustment caused controversy. The solution was a Transitional Tax Regime (RTT), which had the premise that the IFRS regime should be neutral, that is, the new rules are neither meant to create new taxation nor to grant benefits in respect to corporate taxes, including corporate income taxes IRPJ and CSLL, and tax on revenues, PIS and COFINS.

Generally, RTT states that Brazilian corporations should follow the former regime for tax purposes, disregarding the accounting changes that modify the recognition criteria of revenues, costs and expenses. Even though RTT was foreseen as provisional, new legislation to harmonise the tax rules with the IFRS regime has not been enacted.

Additionally, in September 2013, the Normative 1,397 was issued, indicating that the former regime will remain in effect for tax purposes, and also imposing tax rules that go beyond the limits of the legislation for the taxation of dividends.

As dividends are exempt from income tax, Brazilian corporations have distributed their results to investors taking into account their financial statements prepared under the IFRS regime.

Even though the tax rules do not require dividend distributions calculated based on the former regime, the Normative adopted the position that the exemption applies only to the extent that the dividends were derived from results assessed upon the former regime. With this approach, any excess of dividends – even if derived from profits assessed according to the IFRS regime – would be taxed as follows:

· Income tax up to 27.5% for Brazilian individuals;

· IRPJ and CSLL of 34% for Brazilian corporations; and

· Income tax of 15% for non-residents (or 25% for tax havens).

As this approach was not expected after so many years, there was an immediate reaction from several stakeholders, such as corporations, investors, advisers and industry associations, arguing that the Normative is unlawful and should not impose new taxation.

As a result, even though the Normative is still in force (potentially generating liabilities for dividends not taxed), it seems that the government will step back and will impose any taxation on dividends only after introducing a new law, which is expected before the end of this year.

By principal Tax Disputes correspondent for Brazil, Andrea Bazzo Lauletta of Mattos Filho Advogados.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article