Australia: Tax changes in store with new government

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Tax changes in store with new government

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour, PwC

With a newly elected Australian federal government, it is opportune to consider the tax-related changes it proposes in its first term of office. These changes include not only a commitment to abolish the recently implemented carbon tax and mining tax, but also corporate tax rate changes. The following is a snapshot of the main business tax measures that are on the new government's agenda:

  • Reduce the company tax rate from 30% to 28.5% from July 1 2015;

  • Apply a 1.5% levy on companies with more than A$5 million ($4.8 million) in taxable income to fund a paid parental leave scheme which is to provide mothers with 26 weeks of paid leave at their actual wage (capped at A$150,000 per annum) or the national minimum wage (whichever is greater), plus superannuation;

  • Abolish the carbon tax;

  • Discontinue the company loss carry-back measure;

  • Remove for small businesses the increase to the instant asset write off threshold and the A$5,000 upfront deduction for the cost of a motor vehicle;

  • Abolish the minerals resource rent tax which applies to Australian iron ore and coal miners;

  • Introduce an exploration development incentive to provide investors in small minerals exploration companies a tax credit for exploration expenditure;

  • Delay the progressive increases in the compulsory superannuation paid by employers;

  • Discontinue the phase-down of interest withholding tax on financial institutions;

  • Reject the previous government's proposal to remove the statutory formula method for determining fringe benefits tax on employer-provided motor vehicles; and

  • Provide greater taxpayer certainty by requiring all new tax legislation to express the government's policy intent.

At the time of writing, the new government was yet to indicate its position on a number of the former government's un-enacted proposals, for example modified thin capitalisation rules and limiting tax concessions for foreign investment by Australian companies, but has "reserved the right to implement" these measures.

Business will be keenly interested in the government proposal to produce a white paper on tax reform with a view to canvass a range of future options to support lower, simpler, fairer taxes for higher economic growth and better sustained services.

With the government's declaration that "Australia is once more open for business" its first term tax agenda is designed to remove some impediments to growth, with the removal of the carbon tax being the centrepiece of its tax reform agenda.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article