India: Rules for application of general-anti avoidance rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Rules for application of general-anti avoidance rules

nayak.jpg

jain.jpg

Rajendra Nayak


Aastha Jain

A General anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) was introduced in the Indian Tax Law (ITL) in 2012 as a broad-based rule giving wide discretionary powers to Indian revenue authorities to invalidate an arrangement, including disregarding application of tax treaties, if an arrangement is treated as an "impermissible avoidance arrangement". GAAR would come in effect from tax year 2015-16. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, the apex administrative authority of direct taxes in India, has recently issued a notification prescribing rules for the application of GAAR. The rules clarify that GAAR would apply to all tax benefits obtained after April 1 2015. However, it also provides certain exemptions where GAAR would not apply which are as below:

  • An arrangement where the aggregate tax benefit of all the parties to the arrangement in the relevant tax year does not exceed INR30 million ($487,770).

  • A foreign institutional investor (FII) who has not taken any benefit under a tax treaty entered into by India with another country or a specified territory and has invested in listed or unlisted securities with prior permission of the competent authority in accordance with Indian regulatory laws.

  • A non-resident investor who has invested in an FII directly or indirectly by way of an offshore derivative instrument or otherwise.

  • Any income derived from transfer of an investment made before August 30 2010 (the date of introduction of the Direct Tax Code Bill 2010) by such person.

The rules also state that where a part of an arrangement is declared as impermissible, GAAR provisions would apply only in relation to such part and not to the entire arrangement. Further, procedure for invoking GAAR by the Indian revenue authorities is laid out which includes a window for taxpayers to raise objections against invocation of GAAR at different levels during the proceedings. Other aspects like mode, form, manner and time limit for the various steps involved in the procedure are prescribed.

Introduction of GAAR had raised significant apprehensions with the stakeholders/investors followed by representations and expert committee recommendations on various aspects of GAAR. In view of the above, certain amendments were recently carried out in GAAR under the ITL. In the same spirit, the rules appear to address concerns of taxpayers to a large extent and provide clarity on the procedural aspects for application of GAAR. The rules will be effective from tax year 2015-16.

Rajendra Nayak (rajendra.nayak@in.ey.com) and Aastha Jain (aastha.jain@in.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +91 80 4027 5275

Website: www.ey.com/india

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 6 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
The lessons from Ireland are clear: selective, targeted, and credible fiscal incentives can unlock supply and investment
The ITR in-house award winner delves into his dramatic novelisation of tax transformation, and declares that 'tax doesn’t need AI right now'
Recent news of job cuts at EY is symptomatic of how the PwC controversy has tarnished the reputation of the entire ‘big four’
Experts reportedly discussed extending the safe harbour to 2027 to give countries more time to legislate; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Greenberg Traurig made senior tax hires
Gift this article