India: Rules for application of general-anti avoidance rules
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Rules for application of general-anti avoidance rules

nayak.jpg

jain.jpg

Rajendra Nayak


Aastha Jain

A General anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) was introduced in the Indian Tax Law (ITL) in 2012 as a broad-based rule giving wide discretionary powers to Indian revenue authorities to invalidate an arrangement, including disregarding application of tax treaties, if an arrangement is treated as an "impermissible avoidance arrangement". GAAR would come in effect from tax year 2015-16. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, the apex administrative authority of direct taxes in India, has recently issued a notification prescribing rules for the application of GAAR. The rules clarify that GAAR would apply to all tax benefits obtained after April 1 2015. However, it also provides certain exemptions where GAAR would not apply which are as below:

  • An arrangement where the aggregate tax benefit of all the parties to the arrangement in the relevant tax year does not exceed INR30 million ($487,770).

  • A foreign institutional investor (FII) who has not taken any benefit under a tax treaty entered into by India with another country or a specified territory and has invested in listed or unlisted securities with prior permission of the competent authority in accordance with Indian regulatory laws.

  • A non-resident investor who has invested in an FII directly or indirectly by way of an offshore derivative instrument or otherwise.

  • Any income derived from transfer of an investment made before August 30 2010 (the date of introduction of the Direct Tax Code Bill 2010) by such person.

The rules also state that where a part of an arrangement is declared as impermissible, GAAR provisions would apply only in relation to such part and not to the entire arrangement. Further, procedure for invoking GAAR by the Indian revenue authorities is laid out which includes a window for taxpayers to raise objections against invocation of GAAR at different levels during the proceedings. Other aspects like mode, form, manner and time limit for the various steps involved in the procedure are prescribed.

Introduction of GAAR had raised significant apprehensions with the stakeholders/investors followed by representations and expert committee recommendations on various aspects of GAAR. In view of the above, certain amendments were recently carried out in GAAR under the ITL. In the same spirit, the rules appear to address concerns of taxpayers to a large extent and provide clarity on the procedural aspects for application of GAAR. The rules will be effective from tax year 2015-16.

Rajendra Nayak (rajendra.nayak@in.ey.com) and Aastha Jain (aastha.jain@in.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +91 80 4027 5275

Website: www.ey.com/india

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the relief, Brazil’s government has also presented a bill which seeks to re-impose a tax burden on companies’ payroll, one local tax specialist told ITR
Jeremy Brown arrives at the firm after a near 16-year career with Deloitte
PwC could elect a woman into the senior leadership position for the first time; in other news, KPMG Australia has extended its CEO’s term
The Senate report into PwC’s scandal is titled ‘The cover up worsens the crime’
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
The firm’s tax business generated a quarter of HLB’s overall revenues in 2023
While successful pillar two implementation will require collaboration across all units, a combination of internal and external tax advice is at the centre of the effort
Binance has also been accused of manipulating foreign exchange rates via currency speculation and rate-fixing
Six individuals should have raised questions over information they received but did not breach professional standards, according to the firm
The partnership of KPMG UK has installed Holt for a second term as CEO and senior partner; in other news, a Baker McKenzie partner has sued the IRS
Gift this article