International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Notice to non-Chilean resident entities in the context of the indirect sales provision

cortes.jpg

benedetto.jpg

Carolina Gonzalez Cortes


Sandra Benedetto

We commented in previous publications that the tax reform enacted in September 2012 modified the indirect sales rule contemplated in the Chilean Income Tax Law. According to this new rule, the concept of Chilean source income is broadened to capture capital gains obtained in the indirect transfer of Chilean underlying assets wherever the purchaser is domiciled. It was expected that an administrative regulation regarding how this rule will be implemented would be issued by the tax authorities in the short-term, but several months have passed since the new law was enacted and we have no news on such pronouncement. Notwithstanding the above, for those who thought this provision could end up being a "dead loss" as it is difficult to think how the Chilean tax authorities would prevail its tax jurisdiction over the capital gain generated entirely abroad by non-resident entities, especially in cases where the transaction is undertaken far up the chain, be advised that the Chilean tax authorities might be preparing itself to catch up with those incomes deemed to be Chilean-sourced.

According to the indirect sales provision, the Chilean tax authorities could demand from the transferor, its Chilean representative, from the Chilean entity or the acquirer, a statement informing the alienation price of the titles, rights, quotas or shares, and the fair market value of the relevant underlying assets, as well as any other information for the purpose of determining the capital gain levied.

Trough recently issued Ruling No. 1455/2013, the Chilean tax authorities declared that when it is necessary to notify an administrative act to a foreign entity, we must consider the methods indicated in Article 11 and subsequent articles of the tax code (for example, in-person notice, notice through certified letter) all those that are duly regulated trough Circular Letter 48/97, but in addition, it could be possible to use any kind of announcements, as permitted in Article 6 N° 10 of the tax code.

What that is supposed to mean is unclear up to now, but it brings certain examples to our minds, such as letters of requests addressed to foreign tax authorities, publications in foreign newspapers, e-mails sent to corporative electronic addresses, letters sent to postal codes, and faxes, among others.

To this list you can add as many methods as you can imagine, as it seems that in this respect the Chilean tax authorities are revealing itself to be totally flexible, but surely this will be a very controversial issue which opposes the legitimacy of the procedures used with their effectiveness in gathering information to collect taxes.

This implication, among several others surrounding the practical application of the Chilean indirect sales provision, further highlights the urgency of having an official guidance of the Chilean tax authorities with respect to this matter.

Carolina Gonzalez Cortes (carolina.gonzalez.cortes@cl.pwc.com) and Sandra Benedetto (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +562 2940 0155

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF has warned Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.