All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

India's GAAR making progress, says new president


India’s new president, Pranab Mukherjee, has confirmed that consultations and review of the proposed general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) had started before he stepped down as finance minister.

“GAAR, I also deferred it by one year (to April 2013) for further discussions. It (the new panel) can be treated as a continuing affair," Mukherjee told reporters, when asked about the setting up of a new four-member committee last week.

Foreign investors have raised concerns against the introduction of GAAR which was unveiled in a discussion paper in March’s budget.

Before he resigned on June 26, Mukherjee promised to put in place safeguards such as a threshold to ensure that officials would not harass taxpayers, as well as an independent panel.

He had also announced the government's intent to keep participatory notes, which are derivative instruments used by overseas investors several of whom are ineligible to invest in India.

Since Mukherjee’s departure, a document was released that contained all the safeguards, but prime minister Manmohan Singh, who has taken on the responsibility of finance minister in the absence of a replacement, will approve the final document.

Subsequently, the prime minister’s office set up a new committee under Parthasarthi Shome, chief executive of the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, to look at the issue and effectively took away the mandate Mukherjee had given to an earlier panel comprising government officers, foreign institutional investor representatives and other stakeholders.

Comments can be submitted until the end of July and a second draft of the guidelines will be published by August 31. The final guidelines will be submitted to the government by September 30.

The draft GAAR guidelines will also be discussed at International Tax Review's third annual India Tax Forum in Delhi on September 5 & 6.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • RN Dash, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Girish Srivastava, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Additional Solicitor General of India;

  • Prashant Bhatnagar, head of India tax, Procter & Gamble;

  • R Mani, head of India tax, Tata;

  • Ketan Madia, vice president, taxes, GE; and

  •  Bela Seth Mao, head of India tax, Shell.

The foremost Indian tax specialists will tackle this issue and more. It is a unique opportunity to hear their views, increase your understanding of the upcoming changes and how best to prepare for the future.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Italian government published plans to levy capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions, while Brazil and the UK signed a new tax treaty.
Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.