International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan adopts earnings stripping rules


As part of the 2012 Tax Reform, Japan adopted earnings-stripping provisions under which a corporation's deduction for net interest expense paid to a related party will be limited to 50% of adjusted income effective for tax years beginning on or after April 1 2013.



Michael Shikuma

Takeo Mizutani

A related party is any: (i) person with whom the corporation has a 50% of more equity relationship; (ii) person with whom the corporation has a de-facto controlling or controlled relationship; or (iii) third party lender which is financially guaranteed by a person in (i) or (ii). Net interest is the difference between the interest paid to related parties and any interest income which corresponds to such interest paid. Interest paid to related parties includes interest and interest in the form of lease payments or guarantee payments, but excludes back-to-back repo interest and interest paid to a related party lender which is subject to Japan corporation tax. Corresponding interest income includes a pro rata portion of interest income and interest in the form of lease payments received based on the ratio of interest from related parties to total gross interest income, but excludes interest income from resident related parties, domestic corporations, and nonresidents and foreign corporations with a permanent establishment in Japan.

Adjusted income is taxable income to which is added back (or subtracted) net interest expense, depreciation expense, excluded dividend income, and extraordinary loss (or income).

Net interest expense which exceeds 50% of adjusted income is not deductible, but may be carried forward for up to seven years and deducted in such future tax year up to the 50% threshold computed for that tax year. In addition, the unused carryforward amount of a disappearing corporation in a tax qualified merger, or 100% subsidiary in a liquidation, is transferred to the surviving, or parent corporation.

The limitation does not apply if net interest expense for the tax year is ¥10 million ($125,000) or less, or if interest paid to related parties (after deducting back-to-back repo interest, but before deducting corresponding interest income from third parties or nonresidents) is 50% or less of the total interest expense (excluding interest paid to related parties which is subject to corporation tax).

In the case of a corporation which is part of a consolidated group tax filing, the excess of the corporation's net interest (excluding interest of other consolidated group members) over 50% of the adjusted consolidated income, is not deductible.

Where the thin capitalisation interest limitations apply (when the debt-to-equity ratio exceeds 3:1), the deductible interest expense is the lower of the limit under either the thin capitalisation or these earnings stripping rules. If the corporation is subject to the anti-tax haven (controlled foreign corporation) rule, the nondeductible interest paid to the tax haven company (the corporation's foreign subsidiary) is reduced to the extent that the corporation is subject to current tax on the interest income of the tax haven company.

Michael H Shikuma ( & Takeo Mizutani (

Morrison & Foerster

Tel:+ 81 3 3214 6522


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
Sanjay Sangvhi and Sahil Sheth of Khaitan & Co explore this legal concept and its implications for companies doing business in India.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.