Australia: Government winds back tax consolidation opportunities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Australia: Government winds back tax consolidation opportunities

The Australian government has announced significant changes to the way the tax consolidation rules work for company groups.

The latest measures operate to wind back the rights to future income (RTFI) and residual asset tax cost setting rules introduced by the same government only 18 months ago. The changes impact groups of companies that elected to apply the tax consolidation rules, and particularly those groups who have acquired or merged with other companies since July 1 2002.

The RTFI and residual tax cost setting rules had operated to provide significant opportunities to claim tax deductions for the tax cost pushed down to various contractual assets held by a company which was acquired by a tax consolidated group. The government announced that the significant revenue cost of these changes was largely unanticipated and has therefore acted to restrict those measures both prospectively and retrospectively.

Adverse impact

A number of companies relied on the previous law and recognised the benefits in their accounts; in results announcements, in making investment decisions, or in paying dividends. While some claims will be protected where a group has lodged a claim and received a refund before March 31 2011, or received an Australian Taxation Office (ATO) ruling, most companies will not be so lucky.

Different rules for different periods

The measures contain three sets of rules covering transactions in the following periods:

  • July 1 2002 to May 12 2010 – the rules will broadly reinstate the old (pre-2010) rules (with some exclusions) while providing a specific deduction for accrued income;

  • May 13 2010 to March 30 2011 – the rules will broadly protect companies that entered into transactions during this period and who therefore relied on the law in place at the time. In particular, deductions will be available over the lesser of 10 years or the life of a contract for the cost allocated to RTFI contracts (with some exclusions);

  • Post March 30 – a much narrower set of rules apply on a prospective basis chiefly aimed at aligning the outcomes of a share purchase and a direct business asset purchase.

Other changes

A specific tax deduction will be provided for the reset tax cost of consumables in relation to all periods.

Many of the assets carved out of the above rules will be deemed part of the general goodwill of the group.

In many cases, these changes will shift the tax outcomes of share vs asset acquisition decisions back in favour of direct asset deals.

Ian Farmer (ian.farmer@au.pwc.com), Sydney

PwC

Tel: +61 2 8266 2802 Fax: +61 2 8286 2802

Website: www.pwc.com/au

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm demonstrated its sweet spot of litigation with an international twist with the recent win for the Danish tax authority…but it’s not a tax case
The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Gift this article