Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

channel-islands.jpg

The Channel Islands have today lost their battle to overturn the UK government’s decision to block low value consignment relief (LVCR).

This week the UK High Court heard a judicial review of the case, which related to the islands benefitting from this VAT exemption, and ruled that the proposed changes to LVCR are compliant with EU VAT law

The UK chancellor is expected to formally announce the end of LVCR in next week’s budget.

This will mean that from April 1, it is anticipated that VAT of will be applied to all commercial consignments from the Channel Islands, regardless of value.

Mr Justice Mitting told Jersey and Guernsey they could appeal the decision to a higher court.

“I am extremely disappointed at this outcome and we will now be considering whether to lodge an appeal,” said Alan Maclean, Jersey’s Economic Development Minister. “The changes, which are targeted against the Channel Islands alone, create an uneven playing field. We know that some businesses will find it difficult to compete under these circumstances and as such, jobs are likely to be lost

LVCR was established under EU law in the 1980s to exempt low value goods purchased and imported outside the EU from VAT, to cut the administrative costs associated with collecting small amounts of the tax.

However, companies such as Amazon and HMV set up offshore mail-order operations in Jersey and Guernsey – which are not part of the EU – to exploit the VAT relief loophole.

Click here to find out how Channel Island companies will continue to take advantage of the exemption.

FURTHER READING:

Why HMV and Channel Islands’ resistance to scrapping tax relief is futile

UK TREASURY: Why the VAT relief must end

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article