Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

channel-islands.jpg

The Channel Islands have today lost their battle to overturn the UK government’s decision to block low value consignment relief (LVCR).

This week the UK High Court heard a judicial review of the case, which related to the islands benefitting from this VAT exemption, and ruled that the proposed changes to LVCR are compliant with EU VAT law

The UK chancellor is expected to formally announce the end of LVCR in next week’s budget.

This will mean that from April 1, it is anticipated that VAT of will be applied to all commercial consignments from the Channel Islands, regardless of value.

Mr Justice Mitting told Jersey and Guernsey they could appeal the decision to a higher court.

“I am extremely disappointed at this outcome and we will now be considering whether to lodge an appeal,” said Alan Maclean, Jersey’s Economic Development Minister. “The changes, which are targeted against the Channel Islands alone, create an uneven playing field. We know that some businesses will find it difficult to compete under these circumstances and as such, jobs are likely to be lost

LVCR was established under EU law in the 1980s to exempt low value goods purchased and imported outside the EU from VAT, to cut the administrative costs associated with collecting small amounts of the tax.

However, companies such as Amazon and HMV set up offshore mail-order operations in Jersey and Guernsey – which are not part of the EU – to exploit the VAT relief loophole.

Click here to find out how Channel Island companies will continue to take advantage of the exemption.

FURTHER READING:

Why HMV and Channel Islands’ resistance to scrapping tax relief is futile

UK TREASURY: Why the VAT relief must end

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article