Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

channel-islands.jpg

The Channel Islands have today lost their battle to overturn the UK government’s decision to block low value consignment relief (LVCR).

This week the UK High Court heard a judicial review of the case, which related to the islands benefitting from this VAT exemption, and ruled that the proposed changes to LVCR are compliant with EU VAT law

The UK chancellor is expected to formally announce the end of LVCR in next week’s budget.

This will mean that from April 1, it is anticipated that VAT of will be applied to all commercial consignments from the Channel Islands, regardless of value.

Mr Justice Mitting told Jersey and Guernsey they could appeal the decision to a higher court.

“I am extremely disappointed at this outcome and we will now be considering whether to lodge an appeal,” said Alan Maclean, Jersey’s Economic Development Minister. “The changes, which are targeted against the Channel Islands alone, create an uneven playing field. We know that some businesses will find it difficult to compete under these circumstances and as such, jobs are likely to be lost

LVCR was established under EU law in the 1980s to exempt low value goods purchased and imported outside the EU from VAT, to cut the administrative costs associated with collecting small amounts of the tax.

However, companies such as Amazon and HMV set up offshore mail-order operations in Jersey and Guernsey – which are not part of the EU – to exploit the VAT relief loophole.

Click here to find out how Channel Island companies will continue to take advantage of the exemption.

FURTHER READING:

Why HMV and Channel Islands’ resistance to scrapping tax relief is futile

UK TREASURY: Why the VAT relief must end

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
The big four firm is consolidating 16 entities across the region to create a single 6,000-partner behemoth
Brazil’s tax reform unifies consumption taxes to simplify rules, centralise administration and reduce legal uncertainty
The ever-expansive firm has once again attracted a former ‘big four’ talent to lead the new offering
The amended double taxation avoidance agreement removes France’s most favoured nation status for tax treaty benefits
The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
Gift this article