International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Inter-corporate dividend withholding tax hinders free movement of capital

In a case brought by the European Commission (EC) (C-284/09 Commission v. Germany, judgment of October 20 2011), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that Germany’s withholding tax on dividends to other corporations is in breach of community law in that it discourages persons from abroad from investing in Germany.

Dividends paid by a German corporation are subject to a 26.375% withholding tax. On application, this can be reduced to the lower treaty level, or, as applicable, waived under the provisions transposing the EU parent/subsidiary directive. German resident corporations are exempt from corporation tax on their dividend income, but can claim, in their corporation tax returns, a full offset of the withholding tax deducted at source. If an excess remains, they receive a cash refund. A German company receiving a dividend from another German company is therefore never faced with a tax burden, whereas a foreign company receiving the same dividend would be if it does not qualify for parent/subsidiary directive or treaty exemption.

The EC sees this difference in treatment as a discriminatory restriction on the free movement of capital. The ECJ has now agreed, rejecting German government arguments in support of the discrimination (domestic and foreign investors are in different positions – the distinction is to maintain the coherence of the tax system – the credit of withholding tax is a matter for the state of residence) as unfounded. Given that the free movement of capital is the one EU fundamental freedom that does not generally stop at the outside border, it would seem at least possible that the judgment applies to corporate dividend income universally. Certainly, foreign companies that have suffered dividend withholding tax in the past, for which they did not receive a full home country credit, may now be able apply to Germany for a refund – at least within the statutory limitation period of usually four years.

The government has not yet commented on this decision in public. It will have to end the discrimination, but one possible way of doing this would be to abolish the corporation tax exemption for dividend income, at least from portfolio investments.

Dieter Endres (dieter.endres@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6459

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.