Germany: Inter-corporate dividend withholding tax hinders free movement of capital

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Inter-corporate dividend withholding tax hinders free movement of capital

In a case brought by the European Commission (EC) (C-284/09 Commission v. Germany, judgment of October 20 2011), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that Germany’s withholding tax on dividends to other corporations is in breach of community law in that it discourages persons from abroad from investing in Germany.

Dividends paid by a German corporation are subject to a 26.375% withholding tax. On application, this can be reduced to the lower treaty level, or, as applicable, waived under the provisions transposing the EU parent/subsidiary directive. German resident corporations are exempt from corporation tax on their dividend income, but can claim, in their corporation tax returns, a full offset of the withholding tax deducted at source. If an excess remains, they receive a cash refund. A German company receiving a dividend from another German company is therefore never faced with a tax burden, whereas a foreign company receiving the same dividend would be if it does not qualify for parent/subsidiary directive or treaty exemption.

The EC sees this difference in treatment as a discriminatory restriction on the free movement of capital. The ECJ has now agreed, rejecting German government arguments in support of the discrimination (domestic and foreign investors are in different positions – the distinction is to maintain the coherence of the tax system – the credit of withholding tax is a matter for the state of residence) as unfounded. Given that the free movement of capital is the one EU fundamental freedom that does not generally stop at the outside border, it would seem at least possible that the judgment applies to corporate dividend income universally. Certainly, foreign companies that have suffered dividend withholding tax in the past, for which they did not receive a full home country credit, may now be able apply to Germany for a refund – at least within the statutory limitation period of usually four years.

The government has not yet commented on this decision in public. It will have to end the discrimination, but one possible way of doing this would be to abolish the corporation tax exemption for dividend income, at least from portfolio investments.

Dieter Endres (dieter.endres@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6459

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Gift this article