EC’s Semeta is right to demand better European tax cooperation, but blame lies with Austria and Luxembourg

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EC’s Semeta is right to demand better European tax cooperation, but blame lies with Austria and Luxembourg

euro-flag2.jpg

COMMENT: The EU is not united about information exchange, one of the most important global tax policy issues of recent years, and Austria and Luxembourg are to blame.

That is the view of EU Tax Commissioner, Algirdas Semeta, who believes that the two member states are hindering the improvement of tax compliance and information exchange across Europe.

He has a point. The Commission wants to reform the EU Savings Directive to tackle tax evasion and the two countries are standing in the way.

The matter focuses on the bilateral agreements Switzerland has made with EU member states including Germany and the UK. In those deals, the member states have had to revise their accords after concerns that they had made too many concessions to Switzerland, undermining the efforts for stricter rules at an EU level.

So now Austria and Luxembourg have got annoyed with the Commission’s proposals to negotiate all bilateral agreements made by 27 member states.

Luxembourg says it can't agree to let the Commission negotiate savings tax arrangements with non-EU countries until there's more clarity on details of its mandate.

Both member states don’t want to hand more powers to the Commission, claiming that inappropriate rules are pushing capital out of Europe. It seems automatic information exchange is the main sticking point.

But what this argument shows is that getting member states to agree to anything is a very hard task. And a by-product of that is taxpayer uncertainty.

While it would be naïve to think that every Commission proposal will see the light of day and that getting 27 member states to agree to something is easy, what the Commission needs to realise is that taxpayers will stop paying attention to it unless something changes. But though it is the EU executive, it depends on the approval of the member states to get anything done.

A good example of this is the proposal for an EU-wide common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB).

Semeta believes the CCCTB will save EU businesses billions of euros and help attract more foreign investors into Europe, as well as eliminating huge administrative burdens, heavy compliance costs and legal uncertainties that companies face when operating in more than one member state.

It may have taken 10 years of debate and political wrangling to put a proposal on the table and it is by no means certain that the proposal will get enough support from member states to be implemented, but at least taxpayers, officials and advisers now have a picture of what it would look like. But knowing what something looks like does not mean anyone cares about it.

While Europe is rarely as united on tax policy as the Commission would like it to be, few issues are more divisive than the financial transaction tax (FTT).

In the upcoming June edition, International Tax Review assesses the prospects of an EU-wide FTT, what it will mean for taxpayers and whether it remains the best option for making the financial sector pay for its role in the economic chaos.

The full article will be available on www.internationaltaxreview.com on Friday.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article