All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Recent VAT developments in the Belgian real estate sector

belgium2.jpg

Given the complexity of the Belgian VAT regime on immovable property and the magnitude of the VAT amounts at stake, VAT has always been an important aspect in the Belgian real estate sector.

haouari.jpg

ackerman.jpg

Samir Haouari


Peter Ackerman

The pace at which these VAT rules evolve requires businesses to be watchful and to react accordingly. Also in the first half of 2012 there have been some interesting developments, notably in connection to the VAT revision period as well as to the VAT exempt immovable rent. As a general rule VAT taxpayers can immediately deduct input VAT they incur. However, specifically for investment goods, as the legislation foresees in the period during which the initial VAT deduction can be revised should the investment goods no longer be used for the taxable activities. For immovable property this revision period equals 15 years. In the past the 15-year period started on January 1 of the year in which the VAT became due (at the moment of the supply unless the invoice is issued or the payment is received before the supply in which case the VAT would become due on that previous point in time). According to a recent administrative decision which took effect from January 1 2012, the VAT revision period starts on January 1 of the year in which the immovable property is taken into use. In practice this comes down to an extension of the VAT revision period, certainly in situations where the construction and the invoicing are spread over multiple years.

Another important development relates to a Belgian court case on the VAT exempt immovable rent. An immovable rent is in principle VAT exempt in Belgium and does not grant any right to deduct input VAT. Hence the reason why many taxpayers seek for VAT-able alternatives that will enable them to deduct the often large amounts of input VAT they incur in connection to the building. Since the Temco-case of the European Court of Justice in 2004, it has been generally accepted that the essential object of a VAT-exempt immovable rent is the passive manner in which the immovable property is put at the disposal irrespective of whether the tenant has an exclusive enjoyment of the immovable property. However, recently the Brussels Court of Appeal leaned towards a more civil law approach by stating that the exclusive enjoyment is an essential element to constitute a VAT exempt immovable rent.

With respect to the revision period the new administrative point of view provides a clear and workable ground rule, although not always beneficial for the taxpayer. In relation to the VAT exempt immovable rent, the interpretation of the court limits the scope of the VAT exemption and could therefore create opportunities. The practical impact is however less clear, certainly given the fact that Belgian authorities did not yet officially react to this judgment.

Samir Haouari (shaouari@kpmg.com) & Peter Ackerman (packerman1@kpmg.com)

KPMG

Tel: +32 2 708 43 00

Website: www.kpmg.com/be

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Several tax chiefs shared their administrations’ latest digital identity tracking systems and other tax technologies at the OECD’s annual meeting of authorities.
Businesses welcome the UK’s decision to scrap the IR35 reforms but are not happy about the time and money they have wasted to date.
Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree