International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Amendments to maquila rules enter into force in Mexico

On June 30 2011, August 9 2011 and October 10 2011, modifications to the Miscellaneous Foreign Trade Rules were published in Mexico's official gazette.


David Cuellar

Cesar Salagaray

The tax effects for foreign principals (acting under a maquila structure in Mexico) have been a recurrent matter of discussion and analysis since its publication.

In a nutshell, the main benefits offered by the maquila program could be summarised as follows:

  • VAT and custom duties exemption for temporary imported raw-materials, and VAT exemption on temporary imports of M&E;

  • The taxable income of the Mexican maquila may be determined according to specific safe-harbour provisions;

  • The maquila regime includes reductions in the effective income tax and flat tax rate; and

  • Statutory permanent establishment relief for the maquila-related activities carried out by a foreign principal in Mexico.

Although the basic maquila rules remain untouched, this could produce some significant effects in certain specific cases regarding the transfer of temporary imported goods to other Mexican resident entities, for their definitive importation. The amended rule does not include a reference to the VAT Law (Article 29, Section I). So, this amendment implies that virtual exports/imports of goods carried out under a virtual export declaration (V5) no longer qualify as exports of goods for VAT purposes, meaning that Mexican resident entities, acquiring temporarily imported goods in Mexico from a foreign resident, must now withhold and remit VAT. The amendment was supposed to enter into force on October 1, 2011, but it has been deferred to December 1 2011 through a notice posted in the Mexican tax authorities website and the modifications to the Miscellaneous Foreign Trade Rules published on October 10 2011. Perhaps this new rule may be in force by the end of this year or beginning of 2012.

According to the wording of this amendment, open questions that could have a major negative impact to the maquila regime arise. Some of these questions are:

  • Is above-mentioned VAT withheld by Mexican acquirers recoverable?

  • If the virtual export declaration (V5) is not fully equivalent to a definitive export of goods, should the sale of the goods to a Mexican entity be considered as a domestic delivery of goods?

  • If the answer to the above question is yes, could those domestic deliveries of goods trigger a Mexican permanent establishment for the foreign principal?

Considering that the maquila (IMMEX) program was originally intended to promote foreign investment and to offer an attractive tax regime for this industry, these open questions should be answered in the future. However, at this stage, it is advisable that taxpayers review their current maquila structure to have a better understanding of how the amendment could affect their activities and mitigate unfavourable tax effects.

David Cuellar ( & Cesar Salagaray (


Tel: + 52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and how tax authorities are responding.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.