Canada: Residence not a prohibited ground of treaty discrimination
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Residence not a prohibited ground of treaty discrimination

A recent decision of Canada's Federal Court of Appeal considered the non-discrimination provision of the Canada-UK Tax Convention finding that it did not apply because the Canadian domestic legislation in question discriminated based on residency rather than nationality.

The Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that Canada is not prohibited under the treaty from discriminating against taxpayers based on their residency.

In Saipem UK Limited v The Queen, the taxpayer, a non-resident of Canada, claimed deductions in computing its taxable income for purposes of the Canadian Income Tax Act, from activities carried on by it in Canada through a permanent establishment (PE) within the meaning of the treaty. The deductions related to certain non-capital losses from business activities carried on in Canada by a corporation, SEI, that at all material times was related to the taxpayer within the meaning of the act and that was wound up into the taxpayer. The Minister of National Revenue denied the deductions on the basis that the Act required each of the taxpayer and SEI to be a Canadian corporation as defined in the act, and that definition required each corporation to be resident in Canada and either (i) incorporated in Canada, or (ii) resident in Canada throughout the period that began on June 18 1971.

Article 22(1) of the treaty prohibits discrimination on the basis of nationality, and the taxpayer asserted that the provision of the act restricting the deduction to Canadian corporations violated its rights as a UK national, and for purposes of the treaty, to non-discriminatory treatment guaranteed by Article 22. In early 2011, the Tax Court of Canada rejected the taxpayer's position.

Janette Pantry & Rebecca Levi

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2400

Fax: +1 416 863 2653


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article