CRA releases new policy on acquiring information from taxpayers and third parties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CRA releases new policy on acquiring information from taxpayers and third parties

The Canadian tax authority confirmed they will respect solicitor/client privilege but will seek to review auditor's working papers in certain circumstances. Practitioners and clients need to be conscious of the risks when dealing with tax reserves and financial statements warns Bill Maclagan of Blake, Cassels & Graydon.

On May 31 2010, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) issued a revised policy (new policy) on access to information and documents from taxpayers and third parties. This new policy replaces its 1995 guidelines.

Under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the Act), taxpayers are obliged to retain books and records to support their tax positions. The CRA has broad audit powers to request, demand and review such books and records and to request information and answers to questions for any purpose relating to the enforcement of the Act. If not satisfied with answers to questions and requests, the CRA has the power to issue demands for documents from the taxpayer and third parties.

In the new policy, the CRA has confirmed that it will respect solicitor/ client privilege and litigation privilege and that there is a presumption of privilege in correspondence between lawyers and clients. There is not in Canada, however, any accountant/client privilege.

One of the significant issues between taxpayers and CRA has related to the access to accountants and auditors working papers (that is, those papers developed by an auditor to support its audit results and conclusions). There is a significant tension over the issues, because auditors need to openly review tax positions to achieve useful financial statements and yet this can lead to the easy discovery of audit issues for the CRA where difficult positions are involved. Furthermore, such papers are not required to be created under the Act and, arguably, do not constitute books or records. They are simply one person's view of a tax position.

The CRA policy confirms that it will not routinely require audit papers to be provided. However, where a taxpayer is not forthcoming with information, CRA will request or demand the working papers of taxpayer's internal accountants and auditors.

Given the recent focus of the CRA, on aggressive tax planning and positions, one can expect that, especially with uncooperative taxpayers, CRA will increasingly demand access to information from third parties including auditor's working papers. Taxpayers and their accountants and auditors need to be fully aware of this position when creating any tax related documentation and may wish to take steps to establish solicitor/client privilege whenever possible.

Bill Maclagan (wsm@blakes.com) is a partner of Blake, Cassels & Graydon in Vancouver.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Rafael Tena tells ITR about the ‘crazy’ Mexican market, ditching the hourly rate, and refusing to grow his fledgling firm in an ‘unstructured way’
It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
Gift this article