IRS stands down in research tax credit case

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IRS stands down in research tax credit case

The IRS has agreed not to contest a motion which would allow a company to exclude amounts accrued from controlled foreign subsidiaries (CFS) that were members of its controlled group in calculating its research credit.

The IRS has agreed not to contest a motion which would allow a company to exclude amounts accrued from controlled foreign subsidiaries (CFS) that were members of its controlled group in calculating its research credit.

Hewlett Packard, a US technology company, filed a motion in the Tax Court in the case of Hewlett-Packard Co v Commissioner, for summary judgment on the intercompany gross receipts issue. Although the IRS did not object to the characterisation of the CFS aspect of the issue, the agency is still opposed to the portion of HP's motion that relates to the definition of gross receipts, and specifically whether gross receipts should include dividends, interest, rents, royalties and other income.

Recently there has been significant litigation surrounding the computation of research credits. The courts are beginning to address the ambiguity in the statutory language of section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code, which governs issues pertaining to research credits.

In July 2010, the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio ruled in favour of the taxpayer in Procter & Gamble Co. and Subsidiaries v United States, a case that stood for the proposition that all members of a controlled group should be conceived of as a single taxpayer when calculating the research credit.

Tax practitioners praised the outcome of the cases, and the willingness of courts to hear the arguments and issue rulings that will provide helpful guidance to taxpayers.

The IRS has also released settlement guidelines on research credit cases. The Appeals Office is continuing to coordinate the issue.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article