International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: New direct lending opportunities in Italy

foglia.jpg

emma.jpg

Giuliano Foglia


Marco Emma

Italian companies are facing domestic banks' resistance to grant financing (the so-called credit crunch). The Italian government is therefore pursuing a long-term project aimed at supporting access to alternative forms of financing and opening up direct lending in Italy to new financial players. The last step in this respect has been taken with Law Decree no. 91 of June 24 2014, which set forth new tax incentives and regulatory measures for such purposes. First, the Decree introduces an exemption from withholding tax for interest paid by Italian borrowers on medium/long term loans to the following foreign lenders: (i) EU banks, (ii) insurance companies established and authorised under EU member states' legislation, (iii) unleveraged undertakings for collective investments set up in a 'white-list' EU or EEA member state. Although certain requirements to apply such exemption still seem uncertain, such measure is very welcome by Italian market. Before the Decree, in fact, interest paid on loans granted by foreign lenders were subject to Italian withholding tax (recently increased to 26% unless a tax treaty lower rate applies) which usually represents an additional cost for Italian borrowers due to the standard 'gross-up' clauses.

Consistently, also the scope of application of the 0.25% optional substitute tax applicable – in lieu of ordinary documentary taxes – to medium and long-term financings (see our June 2013 update) has now been extended. In particular, under the new rules it now applies to loans granted by (i) securitisation vehicles, (ii) insurance companies established and authorised under EU member states' legislation, (iii) undertakings for collective investments set up in a 'white-list' EU or EEA member state, whereas only Italian banks and Italian permanent establishments of foreign banks were previously admitted to such regime. In addition, such substitute tax now applies also to any transfer of financing agreements on the secondary market, to assignments of receivables and relevant security package, previously subject to taxation.

As for the corporate bonds, the first step was taken with the 2012 measures intended to boost access to bond-financing for non-listed companies, provided that bonds are listed for trading either on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading platform of an EU or EEA white-listed member state. Now the Decree admits non-listed companies to the same tax regime (and to the related withholding tax exemption for non-Italian white-list noteholders qualifiying as beneficial owners) also in relation to non-listed bonds, to the extent that such debt securities are held by one or more white-list 'qualified investors'. Such measure would permit Italian companies access to bond-financing without bearing significant listing expenses. However, certain procedural issues may arise. Moreover, the exemption now applies to bond interest paid to EU undertakings for collective investments and/or Italian securitisation vehicles provided that (i) more than 50% of their assets consist of such securities and (ii) their investors are 'qualified investors' only.

The measures enacted by the Decree are in force as from June 25 2014.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Marco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome) +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.