Canada: Government’s mandate to improve integrity of Canadian tax system continues with enactment of Bill C-4

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Government’s mandate to improve integrity of Canadian tax system continues with enactment of Bill C-4

diep.jpg

caines.jpg

Nancy Diep


Ian Caines

On December 12 2013, Canada enacted Bill C-4, implementing a variety of income tax measures announced in the March 2013 federal budget. One of the stated themes of the budget was improving the integrity of the Canadian tax system and Bill C-4 included a number of new anti-avoidance measures, including an extension of Canada's thin-capitalisation rules and new rules regarding derivative forward agreements (DFAs) and synthetic disposition arrangements (SDAs). Before Bill C-4, Canada's thin-capitalisation rules, which prevent foreign investors from taking profits out of Canada entirely in the form of tax-deductible interest rather than after-tax dividends, only applied to direct and indirect debts of Canadian resident corporations. Effective for taxation years beginning after 2013, Bill C-4 extends these rules to Canadian resident trusts, as well as to debts of non-resident corporations and trusts that carry on business in Canada. For non-resident corporations and trusts, the rules use a notional equity amount based on the cost of property used in such businesses.

The new rules for DFAs and SDAs are targeted at arrangements that synthesise the economic results of certain transactions (for example receipt of certain income streams in the case of DFAs and disposition of appreciated assets in the case of SDAs) without triggering the full corresponding tax consequences. These rules seek to align such tax and economic results but the rules, though aimed at a narrow range of perceived abuses, are broadly drafted and could potentially apply to many transactions.

Bill C-4 also included rules to enact earlier proposals to deny certain deductions in respect of publicly traded stapled securities.

Foreign entities operating in Canada should confirm that their arrangements comply with the expanded thin-capitalisation rules, and should be mindful of the potential impact of the other anti-avoidance rules.

Nancy Diep (nancy.diep@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 403 260 9779

Ian Caines (ian.caines@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 416 863 5277

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Partner payouts could also be reduced by a fifth, it has been reported
There is no logical reason not to extend an exemption from EU CFC rules to multinationals headquartered in side-by-side jurisdictions, USCIB said
Gift this article