International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Government’s mandate to improve integrity of Canadian tax system continues with enactment of Bill C-4



Nancy Diep

Ian Caines

On December 12 2013, Canada enacted Bill C-4, implementing a variety of income tax measures announced in the March 2013 federal budget. One of the stated themes of the budget was improving the integrity of the Canadian tax system and Bill C-4 included a number of new anti-avoidance measures, including an extension of Canada's thin-capitalisation rules and new rules regarding derivative forward agreements (DFAs) and synthetic disposition arrangements (SDAs). Before Bill C-4, Canada's thin-capitalisation rules, which prevent foreign investors from taking profits out of Canada entirely in the form of tax-deductible interest rather than after-tax dividends, only applied to direct and indirect debts of Canadian resident corporations. Effective for taxation years beginning after 2013, Bill C-4 extends these rules to Canadian resident trusts, as well as to debts of non-resident corporations and trusts that carry on business in Canada. For non-resident corporations and trusts, the rules use a notional equity amount based on the cost of property used in such businesses.

The new rules for DFAs and SDAs are targeted at arrangements that synthesise the economic results of certain transactions (for example receipt of certain income streams in the case of DFAs and disposition of appreciated assets in the case of SDAs) without triggering the full corresponding tax consequences. These rules seek to align such tax and economic results but the rules, though aimed at a narrow range of perceived abuses, are broadly drafted and could potentially apply to many transactions.

Bill C-4 also included rules to enact earlier proposals to deny certain deductions in respect of publicly traded stapled securities.

Foreign entities operating in Canada should confirm that their arrangements comply with the expanded thin-capitalisation rules, and should be mindful of the potential impact of the other anti-avoidance rules.

Nancy Diep (

Tel: +1 403 260 9779

Ian Caines (

Tel: +1 416 863 5277

Blake, Cassels & Graydon


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.