Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

japan.jpg

Yasutoshi Nishimura, Japan’s Deputy Economy Minister, is the latest government figure to join the calls for a corporate tax rate reduction.

The Shinzo Abe cabinet has already approved a reform plan that would end the 2011 special corporate tax surcharge in March this year – a year ahead of schedule.

This will see the country’s tax on corporate profits drop from 38% to 35.6%, but Nishimura and others want to see it cut further. Nishimura has called for the corporate tax rate to be cut to less than 30% to boost Japan’s competitiveness in the global market.

“I’d like to see deeper corporate tax cuts in the special economic zones,” said Nishimura.

The government is loosening regulations on companies operating in such zones, and a lower corporate tax rate for these regions could be another measure introduced.

“I want to show the direction of special zone tax reductions,” said Nishimura, who repeated his preference for a move to 30% before implementing further reductions down the line.

Revenue neutral approach possible

Akihiro Hironaka, partner at Nishimura & Asahi, points out that removing certain tax preferences that he considers give unequal treatment to different taxpayers, would harvest sufficient revenue to cut the corporate tax rate.

“It appears to me that many outdated special taxation measures, which are more generous to manufacturers than to service providers and retailers, should be abolished, as it is problematic in terms of equal treatment to taxpayers,” said Hironaka. “If the government abolishes these special taxation measures, it will generate substantial government revenues which enable the government to make corporate tax reductions.”

However, achieving the repeal of such provisions may be tougher than expected, due to the likelihood of intense lobbying efforts from those presently benefitting from the measures.

“It will not be easy because industry sectors that have benefited from these special taxation measures will resist strongly,” said Hironaka.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article