Canada: Canada signs protocol to amend Canada-UK tax treaty

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canada signs protocol to amend Canada-UK tax treaty

bailey.jpg

jones.jpg

Bryan Bailey


Josh Jones

On July 21 2014, Canada and the UK entered into a protocol to amend the Canada-UK tax treaty. The protocol generally eliminates Canada's ability to impose withholding tax on interest paid to a UK resident person dealing at arm's-length with the payer. This parallels recent changes in Canadian domestic law which generally eliminated withholding tax on arm's-length interest payments. Payments of participating interest and payments of interest to non-arm's length persons are generally subject to withholding tax under Canadian domestic law and generally continue to not be exempt from Canadian withholding tax under the treaty. The protocol also introduces new time limits relating to transfer pricing assessments and the mutual agreement procedure between Canada and the UK, as well as a new arbitration process to resolve double tax cases.

Of particular interest is what was not included in the protocol. Notably, no amendments were made to the capital gains article. Generally, gains realised by a non-resident of Canada from the sale of shares of a Canadian private company that derive their value primarily from Canadian real property may be subject to tax under Canadian domestic law. Under the treaty, such gains realised by a UK resident are not taxable in Canada unless the shares derive the greater part of their value from "immovable property" in Canada, which generally excludes property in which the company's business is carried on. The Canadian Department of Finance previously commented that the broad exclusion from "immovable property" was inconsistent with Canadian treaty policy, leading to expectations that a broader "immovable property" definition would be brought in.

Also, no treaty shopping provisions were included in the protocol. Canada has been considering a number of different ways to combat treaty shopping in the context of more broadly based international deliberations associated with the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan. Most recently, Canada invited consultations on a domestic rule to deny treaty benefits otherwise available if "one of the main purposes" of a transaction was to obtain the benefit. The Treaty already contains a main purpose rule for dividends, interest and royalties, but not, for example, for business profits or capital gains.

The protocol must be ratified by Parliament in both countries. If ratification occurs in 2014, the protocol will generally enter into force January 1 2015 for withholding tax purposes, and, for income tax purposes, for tax years beginning after ratification.

Bryan Bailey (bryan.bailey@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 416 863 2297
Josh Jones (josh.jones@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 416 863 4278

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article