International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Federal government revokes COFINS tax exemption on sale of share and quota investments

Foreign investors that are unfamiliar with Brazilian tax legislation may find it unusual, but Brazilian taxpayers have long been used to a system that imposes taxes on corporate revenues as well as on corporate profits.

Such taxes are locally known as contribuição ao Programa de Integração Social (PIS) and Contribuição ao Financiamento da Seguridade Social (COFINS).

It may also seem unusual that the PIS and COFINS taxes are calculated under two alternative criteria: the cumulative method and the non-cumulative method.

The cumulative method is calculated upon the application of a 3.65% joint rate on the amount of gross revenues of the Brazilian companies. While gross revenues should be seen as those basically deriving from the sale of goods and services, the federal government has in the past attempted to widen it to include all the revenues of Brazilian companies.

A few years ago, however, the Federal Supreme Court overruled that attempt and since then taxpayers have been assured that gains deriving from the sale of share or quota investments originally maintained as permanent (or non-current) assets are PIS/COFINS exempt under the cumulative system.

An important change came in May 13 2014 with Law 12,973, which amended the concept of gross revenue concept to include – as of January 1 2015 – all other revenues that may be attributable to the business activity of the Brazilian company. While widened, that concept still does not include gains deriving from the sale of permanent (or non current) assets.

In turn, the non-cumulative method imposes the levy of a 9.25% joint rate on the overall amount of revenues of a Brazilian company, but the PIS and COFINS laws expressly exempt from taxation the gains deriving from the sale of share or quota investments originally maintained as permanent (or non-current) assets.

Provisional Measure 651

On July 9 2014, however, the federal government published Provisional Measure 651 describing that, as of January 1 2015, corporate taxpayers calculating PIS and COFINS taxes under the non-cumulative method must exceptionally allocate to a cumulative method basket the gains on the sale of the share or quota investments above – those already under the cumulative method must simply keep these gains in a separate basket subject to the same method.

Once those gains are in that cumulative basket, the PIS exemption on such gains will be assured, but COFINS tax will start being levied at a 4% rate.

Because it is still a provisional rule, the National Congress must approve it within four months of publication (not including the time during which the National Congress remains on mid-year vacation).

If approved, however, that increase may become the object of tax disputes: the COFINS tax basis under the cumulative method literally still remains focused on operating revenues (gross revenues and those of the business activities) of Brazilian companies, and it is therefore disputable that the imposition of a 4% levy on the assumption that such basis would include gains from non-operating activities.

Luiz Felipe Centeno Ferraz ( is a tax partner of Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr e Quiroga Advogados, the principal Brazilian correspondents of the Tax Disputes channel on

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The winners of the ITR Asia-Pacific Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.