Global Tax 50 2014: ECJ Translators

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global Tax 50 2014: ECJ Translators

Translation service providers

 ECJ Translators

ECJ Translators is a new entry this year

The role of a translator, even one at the European Court of Justice, is surely administrative, organisational and secretarial. A typical translation service involves taking the words put together by one person, organisation or body, and using language skills to make them accessible to a wider audience.

The meaning of those words does not change; the people they can reach does.

But this was not the case this year after the ECJ's judgement in Skandia, published in September, concerning the VAT treatment of cross-border supplies of services from a company headquarters to a branch, and how this differs when VAT groups come into play.

Confusion and concern about the implications of the ruling for various EU member states arose when it became clear there were slight discrepancies in the meaning of different translations of the verdict, which was originally given in Swedish.

The question that led to such controversy was whether the Swedish judgement should be translated to read "as" or "insofar as". The seemingly minor difference in terms would lead to drastically different outcomes. An "as" interpretation would suggest that countries with different grouping rules from Sweden would have to change their legislation, which would broaden the scope of the judgement's impact on national tax regimes dramatically.

It should be pointed out that the translators at the ECJ do a stellar job providing a service that largely goes unrecognised and is taken for granted. Unfortunately, it takes an instance like this to bring those efforts to the fore.

The Global Tax 50 2014

View the full list and introduction

Gold tier (ranked in order of influence)

1. Jean-Claude Juncker  2. Pascal Saint-Amans  3. Donato Raponi  4. ICIJ  5. Jacob Lew  6. George Osborne  7. Jun Wang  8. Inverting pharmaceuticals  9. Rished Bade  10. Will Morris


Silver tier (in alphabetic order)

Joaquín AlmuniaAppleJustice Patrick BoyleCTPAJoe HockeyIMFArun JaitleyMarius KohlTizhong LiaoKosie LouwPierre MoscoviciMichael NoonanWolfgang SchäubleAlgirdas ŠemetaRobert Stack


Bronze tier (in alphabetic order)

Shinzo AbeAlberto ArenasPiet BattiauMonica BhatiaBitcoinBonoWarren BuffettECJ TranslatorsEurodadHungarian protestorsIndian Special Investigation Team (SIT)Chris JordanArmando Lara YaffarMcKessonPatrick OdierOECD printing facilitiesPier Carlo PadoanMariano RajoyNajib RazakAlex SalmondSkandiaTax Justice NetworkEdward TroupMargrethe VestagerHeinz Zourek

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Rafael Tena tells ITR about the ‘crazy’ Mexican market, ditching the hourly rate, and refusing to grow his fledgling firm in an ‘unstructured way’
It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
Gift this article