International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New CFC rules



Ignacio Burrull

Germán Campos

On September 29 2014, Law No. 20.780 was published in the Chilean Official Gazette, which introduced several modifications to the South American country's taxation system. Among other modifications, the Tax Reform introduced article 41 G to the Chilean Income Tax Law (Chilean ITL), which sets forth new regulations regarding the taxation of foreign entities controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Chilean resident, domiciled, or incorporated taxpayer.

As a general rule, foreign source income is subject to taxes in Chile when it is perceived by the Chilean entity or individual. However, under these CFC rules, which will enter into force on January 1 2016, the passive income accrued or perceived by a controlled entity will be deemed as accrued or perceived by the Chilean controlling entity, whichever occurs first, in the same year in which they were generated, with a credit for the taxes paid or due in the country of origin.

There are two main concepts that must be taken into account to be subject to the CFC rules: controlled entity and passive income.

  • Controlled entity, meaning an entity holding, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the:

  • capital; or

  • right to profits; or

  • voting rights;

  • or an option in the same terms described above;

Also, if the holding entity can:

  • select, change or remove the majority of directors or administrators of the foreign entity; or

  • unilaterally modify the bylaws of the entity; or

  • unless proven otherwise, has a participation in a foreign entity that is resident, domiciled or incorporated in a country with low or no taxation, as described in article 41 H of the Chilean ITL (that is, having a gross tax rate lower than 17.5%; not having an exchange of tax information treaty in force with Chile; being considered as tax haven by OECD standards, among others).

  • Passive income. Article 41 G of the Chilean ITL considers that the following concepts, among others, shall be understood as passive income: dividends (unless it comes from an active income entity), interest (unless earned by a bank), lease income, royalties, capital gains, and so on.

If the foreign entity is deemed as controlled by a Chilean entity and the income deemed as passive, the income accrued or perceived by the controlled foreign entity shall be recognised by the Chilean entity in the proportion of the participation it holds in the controlled foreign entity, and considering the general Chilean tax provisions used to determine the net taxable income of taxpayers. The above will generate a demanding workload for the controlling entity in order to "convert" those incomes into Chilean-like income. However, it is noteworthy to mention that, under CFC rules, only the profits are recognised by the Chilean entity, not being able to consider the tax losses generated by the foreign controlled entity.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these CFC rules will only apply when the passive income of the foreign controlled entity exceeds the 10% of the total revenues of said entity in the corresponding period. On the other hand, if the passive income represents more than 80% of the controlled foreign entity, the 100% of said entity's revenues shall be deemed as passive income and, therefore, subject to CFC rules. Nevertheless, the Chilean entity shall only consider the application of CFC rules when the aggregate of passive income coming from controlled foreign entities exceeds UF 2,400 ($100,000 approximately) in each year.

Ignacio Burrull ( and Germán Campos (



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

12th annual awards announces winners
The Fair Tax Foundation published the annual UK public sentiment barometer on tax justice ahead of its flagship event, which ITR attended.
The UK public broadcaster acknowledges paying a low tax rate in India, while the ICAEW appoints a new president for 2023/24.
The Canadian proprietor of Canary Wharf and Manhattan West faces accusations of avoiding tax through subsidiaries in Bermuda and beyond.
The Department of Finance Canada has put forward a package of transfer pricing reforms to clarify existing provisions and address what it says is a disproportionate loss of tax revenue.
Developments included the end of Saudi Arabia’s tax amnesty, Poland’s VAT battle with the EU, the Indirect Tax Forum, India’s WTO complaint, and more.
Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.