Ukraine: Recent tax changes in Ukraine

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ukraine: Recent tax changes in Ukraine

kotenko.jpg

kalyta.jpg

Vladimir Kotenko


Iryna Kalyta

New Ukraine-Cyprus Double Tax Treaty starts applying

On January 1 2014, the Ukraine-Cyprus double tax treaty started to apply. The new treaty supersedes the exceptionally beneficial USSR-Cyprus treaty and provides for 5%/15% on dividends, 2% on interest and 5%/10% on royalties. Ukraine and Cyprus also managed to resolve the discrepancy between the Greek and the Ukrainian texts of the Ukraine-Cyprus treaty and ensured that the USSR-Cyprus treaty ceased to apply when the new treaty started applying, and not earlier.

Decrease of corporate profit tax and VAT rate is postponed

Ukraine postponed the declared decrease of corporate profit tax and VAT rates. In 2014, the VAT rate will remain the same as in 2013 (20%), whereas corporate profit tax rate will go down by one percentage point and be 18% (as opposed to the initially declared 16%).

Transfer of shares exempt from transfer tax

Starting in 2014, the transfer of shares in joint stock companies is no longer subject to the special purpose excise tax (which could reach up to 1.5% of the contract value). This legislative development significantly narrows the list of transactions covered by the tax. The exemption was introduced as part of a package of technical changes to the Tax Code of Ukraine, so it is not clear whether it truly was intended by the law maker.

Developments in new Ukrainian transfer pricing rules

The Ukrainian government adopted a list of low-tax jurisdictions that will apply for transfer pricing purposes. Transactions between Ukrainian companies and non-Ukrainian companies resident in low tax jurisdictions will be subject to Ukrainian transfer pricing rules even if these companies are unrelated. The list comprises of 74 states where the corporate profit tax rate is lower than that of Ukraine by 5%, and includes Cyprus, Ireland and Switzerland.

The Ukrainian government has also published a draft transfer pricing reporting template. The template is similar to that used in Russia, and implies disclosure of detailed information on controlled operations.

Vladimir Kotenko (vladimir.kotenko@ua.ey.com) and Iryna Kalyta (iryna.kalyta@ua.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +380 44 490 3000

Fax: +380 44 490 3030

Website: www.ey.com/ua

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Countries which care about fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
The plan aims to improve the efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness of direct tax administration in India
Meanwhile, South Africa’s finance minister has accepted a court decision on suspending a VAT increase and US President Donald Trump mulls a 100% tariff on foreign films
Jaime Carey speaks about the benefits of his tax background, DEI values, the use of AI for a smarter legal practice, and other priorities that will define his presidency
Historically low levels of attrition over consecutive years made a ‘difficult decision’ necessary, PwC has reportedly said
WTS Global is also vetting new potential member firms in Algeria, Cote D’Ivoire and Benin, Kelly Mgbor tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The scope of qualifying pillar two tax credits could reportedly be broadened; in other news, hundreds of IRS appeals staff are to resign
For many taxpayers, the prospect of long-term certainty that a bilateral APA offers can override concerns about time, cost and confidentiality
Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
Gift this article