China: New China-France double tax agreement signed

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: New China-France double tax agreement signed

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

A new China-France double tax agreement (DTA), set to replace the 1984 China-France DTA and its associated protocol of the same year, was signed on November 26 2013 alongside a new protocol. Assuming the remaining approval procedures are completed in the course of 2014, the new DTA could take effect from as early as January 1 2015. The old DTA provides no incremental benefit for a French company driving dividends from China. The new DTA goes further providing that a 5% rate will apply to a French company where direct shareholdings of 25% and above are held in a Chinese company.

The change to the capital gains article, clarifying that taxing rights on gains not dealt with elsewhere in the article are reserved to the residence country, helps to settle a long-running ambiguity as to whether gains on disposals of Chinese shareholdings of less than 25% would be exempt from Chinese withholding tax (WHT) under the China-France DTA. Further, the protocol provides that 0% WHT will apply to dividends, interest and capital gains, other than those in relation to immovable properties, derived by qualified, listed sovereign wealth funds (SWF).

Another salient point is the detailed provision concerning the application of the DTA in situations involving partnerships. Where China sourced income arises to a French partnership, then DTA benefits may be granted to the French partnership, if it is a taxable person under the French tax law, or granted to the French partners, if they are instead treated as the taxable persons under the French tax law. In other words, the characterisation of the French partnership by France controls in this case. In contrast, where China sourced income arises to a Chinese partnership with French partners, DTA benefits may be denied if either France or China views the Chinese partnership as non-transparent.

The new DTA also provides clearer definitions of permanent establishment (PE) and the PE profit attribution methodology, which should be of particular benefit to French investors into China. Construction and installation projects, which are now expanded to include associated supervisory services, now only constitute a PE if they continue for more than 12 months, as against six months in the old DTA. In addition, the shift from the six months test to the 183 days for the service PE is positive for French investors.

Specific anti-avoidance limitation on benefits (LOB) clauses, which exclude the application of DTA benefits where the main purpose or one of the main purposes of an arrangement is to take advantage of the terms of the DTA, have been included in each of the dividend, interest, royalties and other income articles. This means that the Chinese general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) may be applied where appropriate.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082
Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article