International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Extension of Canadian thin capitalisation rules announced



Kathleen Penny

Ian Caines

The Canadian Income Tax Act (ITA) contains thin capitalisation rules limiting the ability of Canadian resident corporations to reduce their taxable income by using related party debt financing from non-residents. Where these rules apply, interest deductions may be denied, and interest payments may be deemed to be dividends for withholding tax purposes. The 2014 Canadian federal Budget proposes to extend these rules to also apply to a range of back-to-back lending arrangements, where an unrelated intermediary lends money to a Canadian corporate borrower, the intermediary receives certain benefits from a non-resident and the thin capitalisation rules would otherwise have applied to a direct loan from the non-resident to the borrower. According to the Budget, the new rules are aimed at arrangements that interpose "a third party (for example a foreign bank) between two related taxpayers" to avoid the thin capitalisation rules, that is where a non-resident effectively funds an unrelated intermediary's loan to a Canadian resident related to the non-resident. However, as proposed, the new rules are drafted very broadly and might (depending on how they are interpreted) result in the application of the rules in situations where (i) a non-resident directly or indirectly provides an interest in property to the intermediary as security for a borrower's debt, or (ii) the intermediary owes any debt to the non-resident for which recourse is, or may be, limited. As proposed, it appears that these rules might apply in a broad range of common commercial transactions, such as where a Canadian corporation's borrowing is supported by a secured guarantee from a non-resident parent company or other non-resident affiliate, or where such a Canadian corporation is party to a secured co-borrowing. The rules might also apply to certain corporate group cash pooling arrangements, where Canadian entities are in a net debit position in the arrangement. We understand that government officials are considering whether the possible reach of the new rules may go beyond what had been intended, and if so the government may narrow the scope of the new rules in the final enacted legislation.

Kathleen Penny (

Tel: +1 416 863 3898

Ian Caines (

Tel: +1 416 863 5277

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Fax: +1 416 863 2653


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.