Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

Using the tax system to attract investment into a country is nothing new. The UK has come under pressure over the lengths to which it is going to ensure potential foreign investors see it as "open for business", with the Patent Box regime coming under challenge and with claims the country is becoming a tax haven through its attractive controlled foreign company (CFC) rules and declining corporate tax rate. But if one country has been a trailblazer in this regard, it is Switzerland.

Switzerland was having its tax policies challenged by the EU when the UK's Patent Box regime was merely a twinkle in its implementers' eyes. Now, against a backdrop of international reforms and unprecedented levels of transparency and scrutiny of multinational tax affairs, in tandem with pan-European harmonisation measures, the scope for challenge of national regimes is increasing. Examples such as the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, and the way in which it has been imposed on financial institutions and tax authorities around the world, highlight that outliers will no longer be tolerated.

With this in mind, Schellenberg Wittmer looks at what the international debate on tax transparency means for Swiss levels of information exchange.

Deloitte narrows that line of enquiry to focus on tax transparency trends in global banking and analyse how these patterns are likely to impact the Swiss financial services sector. Staying with FS, burckhardt explains the taxation of option rights granted to shareholders.

PwC tackles domestic reform, and looks in detail at specific measures including the proposed Licence Box for innovation and the notional interest deduction on surplus equity.

KPMG assesses the Swiss mobility challenge. Immigration changes are making it harder to enter the country while companies are having trouble convincing employees to leave the attractive working environment behind.

Distracted by attractive direct tax rules, potential investors in Switzerland often overlook indirct tax concerns. But here KPMG outlines advantages in the Swiss VAT system. The firm also identifies what impact OECD-level discussions on base erosion and profit shifting will have on the country, and provides a primer on taxpayer priorities when making acquisitions in Switzerland.

Many of these – mobility challenges, BEPS issues, increasing exchange of information – could be perceived as a threat to the position Switzerland holds within the international tax and finance framework, and that is precisely what Tax Partner – Taxand tackles in an article looking at the decisions that will be necessary to maintain competitiveness and attractiveness

Matthew Gilleard

Corporate Tax editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Gift this article