EU: Update on the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Update on the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

The Lithuanian EU Presidency presented its end-of-term six-monthly progress report on the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) to the ECOFIN Council. With regard to the code group, the ECOFIN Council (the EU-28 finance ministers) of December 10 2013 subsequently:

  • Welcomed the progress achieved by the code group during the Lithuanian Presidency as set out in its six-monthly progress report;

  • Asked the group to continue monitoring standstill and the implementation of the rollback as well as its work under the Work Package 2011;

  • Invited the Commission to continue and conclude the dialogue with Switzerland by June 30 2014;

  • Invited the group to continue its consideration of the draft guidance on hybrid entity and hybrid permanent establishment mismatches;

  • Invited the group to analyse the third criterion of the Code of Conduct (presence or not of real economic activity) by the end of June 2014;

  • Invited the group to assess or consider all patent boxes in the EU, including those already assessed or considered before, by the end of 2014, ensuring consistency with the principle of equal treatment, against the background of BEPS;

  • Invited the group to report back on its work to the Council by the end of the Greek Presidency in June 2014.

The code group is a political, inter-governmental peer pressure group which brings together on a fairly regular basis the 28 directors-general of the national Ministries of Finance, Brussels-based national fiscal attachés, as well as direct tax officials from the European Commission.

The code group is therefore not a formal EU institutional / Council legislative working group. Decision-making is based on consensus minus one (if necessary) to ensure that progress can be made. While its recommendations are soft law, they are nevertheless quite binding on member states. As an illustration of the code group's prowess, for instance, the political agreement reached in the code group in 2010 on tackling hybrid loan mismatches (PPLs) will now be codified in the revised EU Parent-Subsidiary (legislative) Directive this year. The code remains essentially under the radar as an obscure, opaque process and that is exactly why it is so successful. The only real substantial reporting on this group are six-monthly progress reports to the EU's finance ministers by each outgoing EU Presidency, and even these reports are usually only made available to the general public after three weeks or so. No other formal announcements and no official minutes of the code group are published.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article